| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Zanotto, Edgar D.
;
Mauro, John C.
Total Authors: 2
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | Entropy; v. 20, n. 9, p. 6-pg., 2018-09-01. |
| Abstract | |
In a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-accepted knowledge in the field from both theory and experiments. The objective of this short comment is to clarify several of these issues. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 13/07793-6 - CeRTEV - Center for Research, Technology and Education in Vitreous Materials |
| Grantee: | Edgar Dutra Zanotto |
| Support Opportunities: | Research Grants - Research, Innovation and Dissemination Centers - RIDC |