| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Bianchetti, Matteo
;
Venturi, Giorgio
Total Authors: 2
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY; v. 42, n. 1, p. 15-pg., 2023-02-01. |
| Abstract | |
We propose a novel, ontological approach to studying mathematical propositions and proofs. By "ontological approach" we refer to the study of the categories of beings or concepts that, in their practice, mathematicians isolate as fruitful for the advancement of their scientific activity (like discovering and proving theorems, formulating conjectures, and providing explanations). We do so by developing what we call a "formal ontology" of proofs using semantic modeling tools (like RDF and OWL) developed by the computer science community. In this article, (i) we describe this new approach and, (ii) to provide an example, we apply it to the problem of the identity of proofs. We also describe open issues and further applications of this approach (for example, the study of purity of methods). We lay some foundations to investigate rigorously and at large scale intellectual moves and attitudes that underpin the advancement of mathematics through cognitive means (carving out investigationally valuable concepts and techniques) and social means (like communication, collaboration, revision, and criticism of specific categories, inferential patterns, and levels of analysis). Our approach complements other types of analysis of proofs such as reconstruction in a deductive system and examination through a proof-assistant. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 16/25891-3 - Arbitrariness and genericity: or on how to speak of the unspeakable |
| Grantee: | Giorgio Venturi |
| Support Opportunities: | Research Grants - Young Investigators Grants |