Embodied meaning and meaning as use: an investigation on the relations between cog...
The limit of language and thought in Wittgenstein's Tractatus
Grant number: | 14/15037-0 |
Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate |
Start date: | November 01, 2014 |
End date: | June 01, 2018 |
Field of knowledge: | Humanities - Philosophy |
Agreement: | Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) |
Principal Investigator: | João Vergílio Gallerani Cuter |
Grantee: | Raquel Albieri Krempel |
Host Institution: | Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas (FFLCH). Universidade de São Paulo (USP). São Paulo , SP, Brazil |
Associated research grant: | 12/50005-6 - The Middle Wittgenstein, AP.TEM |
Associated scholarship(s): | 17/02074-2 - Thought, language and concepts, BE.EP.DR |
Abstract The main goal of this project is to present and discuss the controversial language of thought hypothesis, first formulated by Jerry Fodor in The Language of Thought. According to it, thought has a linguistic structure, but cannot be identified with any particular natural language. Rather, the language of thought is innate, and it is what makes learning a first language possible. The hypothesis has gained supporters such as Zenon Pylyshyn, who tries to base it on the cognitive sciences, and Steven Pinker, who accepts it in general terms, but differs from Fodor in saying that thought may also take the form of mental images. Despite being popular amongst philosophers and cognitive scientists, there are a number of strong criticisms that can be directed against the language of thought hypothesis. One derives from linguistic relativism. According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, the language one speaks determines, or at least influences, his thoughts and perceptions of the world. Therefore, this idea calls into question the antecedence and independence of thought from language, which is presupposed by the language of thought. I intend to present and discuss both the differences within the group of proponents of the language of thought hypothesis, as well as the tensions between the language of thought hypothesis and a part of the philosophical tradition. I also intend to show what kind of counterarguments could be formulated against the objections to the language of thought hypothesis. (AU) | |
News published in Agência FAPESP Newsletter about the scholarship: | |
More itemsLess items | |
TITULO | |
Articles published in other media outlets ( ): | |
More itemsLess items | |
VEICULO: TITULO (DATA) | |
VEICULO: TITULO (DATA) | |