Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Maria Augusta Carvalho Rodrigues
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | Ribeirão Preto. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto (PCARP/BC) |
| Defense date: | 2013-03-26 |
| Examining board members: |
Antonio Cardozo dos Santos;
Maria de Lourdes Pires Bianchi;
Terezila Machado Coimbra;
Daniel Junqueira Dorta;
Elisangela de Paula Silveira Lacerda
|
| Advisor: | Antonio Cardozo dos Santos; Glenda Carolyn Gobe |
| Abstract | |
Cisplatin is one of the most effective anticancer agents; however, its clinical use is limited mainly by its nephrotoxicity. The adjuvant therapy with antioxidants has been suggested as a strategy of protection against the toxicity induced by cisplatin in healthy tissues and the efficacy of different antioxidants has been demonstrated in several experimental models. However, most of these compounds described as cytoprotectors have never been tested in tumor-bearing models, and there is not a consensus on the impact of the antioxidant therapy on the antitumor activity of cisplatin. Moreover, there are few data about the effect of many of these compounds on human health; some can even display pro-oxidant activity under certain conditions. Our previous studies have demonstrated that the beta-blocker carvedilol efficiently protects against the nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin in rats. In the present study two new aspects of the protection of carvedilol were explored: (a) the effect of carvedilol on the antitumoral effect of cisplatin and (b) the molecular mechanisms of protection. The first aspect was evaluated in vivo in Sarcoma-180-tumor-bearing mice. In this model, four groups groups (n=8) of Swiss, adult mice, inoculated with Sarcoma-180 cells (subcutaneous via) were treated as follows: (I) Control group: carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% (0.10mL/ 30g animal, oral, once a day, 3 days) and saline solution (0.75mL/30g animal, intraperitoneal or ip, on the first day); (II) Cisplatin group (Cisp): cisplatin 25mg/kg, i.p., on the first day; (III) Carvedilol + Cisplatin group (CV+Cisp): carvedilol (10mg/kg, oral, once a day, 3 days) and cisplatin (25 mg/kg, i.p., on the first day); (IV) Carvedilol group (CV): carvedilol (10mg/kg, oral, once a day, 3 days). The renal function (plasmatic BUN and creatinine) and the renal histopathology, showed the renal damage induced by cisplatin and the nephroprotection of carvedilol. The biodistribution of platinum (ICP-MS) and the antitumor activity of cisplatin (tumor remission index and survival curve) were not altered by carvedilol. Carvedilol did not protect against the mutagenicity (evaluated in the peripheral blood) and the bone marrow suppression induced by cisplatin. TUNEL assay and the imunnohistochemical analyses of the cleaved caspase-3 and the proapoptotic protein Bax showed the protection of carvedilol against the apoptosis induced by cisplatin in the renal tissue; however, the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL remained unaltered in the four groups. The involvement of the antioxidant activity of carvedilol in the protective mechanism was demonstrated by lipid peroxidation and GSH assays in the renal tissue. The mechanistic studies were performed in vitro in HK-2 cells (from normal human kidney) divided into four groups of treatment: (I) Control: phosphate buffered saline (PBS); (II) Cisp: 25?M cisplatin; (III) CV+Cisp: 50?M carvedilol and 25 ?M cisplatin; and (IV) CV: 50 ?M carvedilol. Reduced cell death by apoptosis and reduced expression of caspase-3, pro- caspase-9 and Bax were observed in CV+Cisp as compared to Cisp. Similarly to the in vivo studies, no alterations in the expression of Bcl-xL were observed. The activity of SIRT-1 was increased in the group CV+Cisp, but was unaltered in all the other groups. Additionally, the antioxidant mechanism of carvedilol was associated with the scavenging of ferrous ions but not with the scavenging of free radicals. In conclusion, the nephroprotective activity of carvedilol is associated with antioxidant iv mechanisms which probably results from the scavenging of ferrous ions. The nephroprotective mechanism of carvedilol does not reduce the antitumor activity of cisplatin, which suggests that distinct mechanisms are responsible for the nephrotoxicity and the antitumor activity of cisplatin. Moreover, the oxidative stress might play a central role in the nephrotoxicity, but this does not happen in the antitumor activity, which has been associated mainly with nuclear DNA damage. These findings suggest that the antioxidant therapy might be a safe alternative to protect healthy tissues during cisplatin chemotherapy. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 09/10583-8 - Evaluation of the interference of the antioxidant effect of carvedilol, a potential nephroprotective agent, on cisplatin antitumoral activity |
| Grantee: | Maria Augusta Carvalho Rodrigues |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate |