![]() | |
Author(s): |
Angelica Martins Batista
Total Authors: 1
|
Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
Press: | Campinas, SP. |
Institution: | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Faculdade de Ciências Médicas |
Defense date: | 2014-01-31 |
Examining board members: |
Sandra Cecília Botelho Costa;
André Fattori;
Luiz Roberto Lopes;
Maria Aparecida Barone Teixeira;
Cristina Brandt Friedrich Martin Gurgel
|
Advisor: | Sandra Cecília Botelho Costa; Eros Antonio de Almeida |
Abstract | |
Current laboratory diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease relies on conventional serological tests but false-positive and false-negative results may occur. Hemoculture can also be used as a diagnostic method but its sensitivity in chronic phase is limited due to the low/intermittent parasitemia. Molecular diagnosis methods have been studied and the main technique that has been extensively tested is the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). This study aimed to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative PCR performance for diagnostic purposes in patients with megaesophagus. We studied DNA blood samples from 26 patients with negative or inconclusive conventional serology for Chagas disease and from 33 patients with positive serology. The most suitable target for qualitative PCR presenting high positivity was the Sat-DNA of T. cruzi. When compared to the quantitative results, the concordance between the two molecular methods in both groups was 72.72%. In addition, we observed that all patients with positive results of hemoculture had positive qualitative PCR. The qPCR methodology although highly sensitive could not detect minimal amounts of T. cruzi DNA in one patient with positive hemoculture. Our results indicate a possible misdiagnosis of patients with megaesophagus given by the negative or inconclusive serology for Chagas disease. Due to its good performance, the qualitative PCR is a useful tool to determine the megaesophagus etiology (AU) |