Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Thais Gimenez Cóvos
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Odontologia (FO/SDO) |
| Defense date: | 2016-05-13 |
| Examining board members: |
Fausto Medeiros Mendes;
Mariana Minatel Braga Fraga;
Susana Morimoto;
Claudio Mendes Pannuti;
Livia Maria Andalo Tenuta
|
| Advisor: | Fausto Medeiros Mendes |
| Abstract | |
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of visual, radiographic and fluorescence-based methods in the detection of caries lesions in permanent and primary teeth, to perform meta-analysis of the overall performance of the methods and to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity. Three distinct systematic reviews related to each diagnostic method were performed. Four observers evaluated the articles, at least two per method. They performed the search and study selection independently; a researcher with experience in caries diagnostic studies solved the cases of conflict or doubt. Electronic databases used were MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus, to reduce publication bias, were also pursued academic papers and unpublished documents through OpenSigle and the Annals of ORCA Congress. After the selection of studies by well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were collected and recorded, independently by each reviewer. Methodological quality assessment was performed through Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS) and statistical analysis using Paired Forest Plot, Summary Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis (SROC), relative diagnostic odds ratio (RDOR), sensitivity analysis and funnel plot, in addition we explored possible sources of heterogeneity. Regarding the accuracy of visual method, 102 articles met the inclusion criteria. In general, visual analysis showed that the method had a good accuracy in the detection of caries lesions. Although laboratory and clinical studies have shown similar accuracies, clinical studies have obtained higher specificities. We also observed moderate to high heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias in most studies. In addition, the use of visual scoring systems resulted in significantly better accuracy compared to studies using their own criteria. Concerning the clinical relevance of accuracy studies of visual method, 96 studies were included. In general, most studies failed to consider some relevant clinical aspects: only 1 study included assessment of activity of the lesions; no study considered their prognosis; 79 studies did not consider a relevant clinical outcome and only 1 evaluated a patient-centered outcome. With regard to the methodological quality, most of the present studies showed a high risk of bias in the selection of the sample. With concern to the radiographic method, 116 articles were selected. Conventional and digital radiographic methods showed similar performance, showing greater specificity values compared to sensitivity, and higher AUC values at the threshold of more advanced caries lesions. Regarding fluorescence-based methods, 75 studies met the inclusion criteria. In general, the analysis demonstrated that the fluorescence-based method tend to have similar accuracy for all types of teeth, dental surfaces or settings. There was a trend of better performance of fluorescence methods in detecting more advanced caries lesions. We also observed moderate to high heterogeneity and evidenced publication bias. In conclusion, the visual method of detecting caries lesions has a good overall performance, but studies should consider relevant clinical outcomes, as well as accuracy. In addition, they should be conducted with greater methodological quality, especially in relation to sample selection. Still, the use of detailed and validated indices seems to improve the accuracy of the method. Radiographic method showed no difference between the image acquisition modes (digital or conventional), showing a tendency to higher values of specificity and performance in advanced caries lesions. Fluorescence-based devices showed similar overall performance; however, a better accuracy in detecting more advanced caries has been observed. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 12/17888-1 - Performance of visual, radiographic and laser fluorescence methods in detecting carious lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and investigating sources of heterogeneity |
| Grantee: | Thaís Gimenez Cóvos |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate (Direct) |