Specificity in the assembly of Septins filaments: the case of the G interface between SEPT5 and SEPT8

Author(s)

Diego Antonio Leonardo Cabrejos

• Document type: Master's Dissertation
• Press: São Carlos.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Instituto de Física de São Carlos (IFSC/BT)
• Defense date: 2016-06-27

Examining board members

Richard Charles Garratt; Sandro Roberto Marana; Flávio Henrique da Silva

• Advisor: Richard Charles Garratt

Abstract

Septins are a conserved family of proteins that bind and hydrolyze GTP and form heterofilaments, rings and networks in order to carry out their functions. They have three structural domains: an N-terminal domain containing a polybasic sequence (for membrane binding), a nucleotide-binding (G) domain and a C-terminal domain including a sequence predicted to form a coiled-coil. In humans, 13 septins have been classified into four groups (I, II, III and IV) based on their amino acid sequences. The only structurally characterized filament described to date is formed by SEPT2-SEPT6-SEPT7, which reveals that the subunits interact through two different interfaces (G and NC). The structural determinants of correct filament assembly are poorly known, and this is limited by the complexity of purifying and crystallizing trimeric or tetrameric complexes. An alternative approach is to study a single filament interface (G or NC) on its own. Here, we aimed to study, using biophysical and structural approaches, the G interface formed between SEPT5 and SEPT8 to elucidate the factors relevant to determining its specificity. The GTPase domain of SEPT5 and SEPT8, were cloned into the bicistronic expression vector pET-Duet, co-expressed and co-purified. Studies to determine the oligomeric state and homogeneity of the complex were conducted using size exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation, revealing a monodisperse dimer for SEPT5-SEPT8(G). The complex elutes with an approximately equimolar mixture of bound nucleotides (GTP and GDP) whereas SEPT8(G) alone is shown to be unable to bind either. Furthermore, the complex has a greater thermostability than SEPT8(G), demonstrated by an increase of 5°C in Tm. In order to determine the structural determinants of specificity, crystallization trials were conducted and crystals of the SEPT5-SEPT8(G) complex were obtained, but these diffracted to only very low resolution. In the absence of a crystal structure, homology modeling was performed to analyze the potential G interfaces between different septin combinations. An interaction between characteristic amino acids (those which are unique to given septin group) was identified for the complex formed between group III septins (including SEPT5) and group II septins (including SEPT8). This interaction, between Phe131 (group II) and Thr19 (group III) may explain the specificity in the formation of a G interface between septins of these groups during filament formation and furthermore the importance of GTP bound to the group II septin. These observations allow us to propose for the first time a plausible explanation for relevance of the loss of catalytic activity by this septin group, an unexplained fact up until now. Mutation of the identified residues resulted in a change in the elution profile of the complex from the size exclusion column suggesting structural alterations in the mutants. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 14/04233-2 - Specificity in the assembly of septin filaments: the case of interface G between SEPT5 and SEPT8
• Grantee: Diego Antonio Leonardo Cabrejos
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master