Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Christian Colin
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Conjunto das Químicas (IQ e FCF) (CQ/DBDCQ) |
| Defense date: | 2006-02-06 |
| Examining board members: |
Mari Cleide Sogayar;
Sergio Verjovski de Almeida;
Bettina Malnic;
Luis Fernando Lima Reis;
Sara Teresinha Ollala Saad
|
| Advisor: | Mari Cleide Sogayar |
| Abstract | |
Gliomas are among the most frequent and fatal tumors of the central nervous system. Despite the recent and important advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic fields, treatment of these tumors still is, in the vast majority of the cases, palliative. Surgical ressection of the tumor remains as the sole potentially curative resource, but only for the low grade gliomas. In the present work, differential gene expression profiles were analyzed between rat glioma cell lines differing in tumorigenic potential (ST1 and P7 cell lines), aimed at identifying genes with potential to become novel molecular markers and therapeutic targets for the human disease. As a first approach, a commercial macroarray-based screening was undertaken in order to identify differentially expressed genes between ST1 and P7 rat glioma cell lines. Three different sets of commercial membranes comprising 3,000 genes were hybridized against radiolabeled targets that were synthesized from mRNA extracted from both cell lines. As a result, near 2,000 genes were identified as being possibly differentially expressed between ST1 and P7 celllines. The relative expression levels of 40 genes from this list were analyzed by Northern blot, and six genes were successfully confirmed as being expressed at higher levels in the ST1 cell line, whereas four genes confirmed heightened expression in P7 cells. As a second approach, a large-scale, Affymetrix microarray-based screening was performed, which allowed measuring the relative expression levels of about 24,000 rat transcripts. This analysis led to the identification of 1,300 candidate differentially expressed genes, for which the differential expression ratios ranged from 2 up to >3,000. From these, -700 genes displayed preferential expression in the ST1 cell line, while around 500 genes were more expressed in P7 cells. The following step, namely, validation of the differential expression, was achieved through Real-Time PCR (Q-PCR). Expression levels of 49 genes were measured in four independent RNA preparations from ST1 and P7 cell lines. About 27 of these genes were identified as putative differentially expressed , 10 of which had previously been confirmed by Northern blot as differentially expressed and 12 additional genes were also included. From this list, 21 genes were confirmed by Q-PCR as being diferentially expressed between the ST1 and P7 cell lines, in addition to those 10 whose differential expression was confirmed by Northern Slol. In total, eight genes were confirmed as being differentially expressed in the ST1 cell line, and 23 genes were confirmed as being expressed at higher leveis in the P7 cells. Many of the genes confirmed as being differentially expressed genes in the ST1 cell line are, directly or indirectly, related to growth arrest and suppression of the malignant phenotype. On the other hand, several of the genes displaying elevated expression in the P7 cell line code for growth factor ligands and receptors related to the PDGFs (platelet-derived growth factors), FGFs (fibroblast growth factors) and PTN/MDK (pleiotrophin/midkine) growth factor families. Many of these genes are already known as being related to neoangiogenesis and to the establishment of autocrine/paracrine loops in human gliomas. In addition, these findings are in keeping with the significantly higher (p<O.01) tumorigenic potential displayed by the P7 cellline (-2,5x), when both cell lines are injected s.c. in the dorsal region of immunodeficient nude mice. Moreover, ST1 and P7 celllines were originally isolated as clonal celllines from the C6 cell line which, in turn, is also acionai cell line. Therefore, a possible interpretation for the remarkably different gene expression profiles between ST1 and P7 cell lines is that those differences are, most Iikely, a consequence of a few molecular defects in key/master genes, rather than extensive aberrations of the cellular genome, given that those celllines have, a priori, similar genetic backgrounds. Thus, a limited number of genetic aberrations, characterisitic of each cell line, would be sufficient for a substantial modification of the gene expression profiles, provided that the altered genes are able to modulate the expression of each other. In an attempt to investigate theis point, the relative expression levels of the same genes were analyzed by Q-PCR, and pairwise correlation tests (Pearson correlation tests) were performed using expression data from the six human glioma cell lines, aimed at identifying gene sets that displayed coordinate expression whichwould suggest the existence of putative regulatory loops among them. It was possible to identify a c1uster of six genes (CHD7, FGF1, PDGFRA, PTN, PTPRZ1, SCG2) that displays coregulated expression, thus suggesting a possible reciprocal co-regulation among distinct growth factor pathways and a putative chromatin remodeling factor (CHD7). Furthermore, the CHD7 gene was identified as a novel, putative chromatin remodeling factor, and its full-Iength cDNA could be successfully amplified by means of long RTPCR. The expression levels of the same genes was quantified, by Q-PCR, in 64 clinicai samples, comprising gliomas and non-tumoral human brain tissue samples. Except for the SCG2 gene, the remaining five genes (CHD7, FGF1, PDGFRA, PTN and PTPRZ1) were expressed at significantly higher levels in glioma samples of all grades, when compared to non-tumoral human brain tissue samples (p<O.05). Likewise, we were able to verify that expression levels for many of these genes are strictly correlated in those samples. A particularly high levei of significance was found for the correlation of expression levels between CHD7xPDGFRA (p=4.7x10-17) and also for the FGF1xPTN gene pair (p=1.1x10-19). A strikingly high level of significance (p=1.6x10-14) was also found for the expression levels between the PTPRZ1 receptor and its PTN ligand. Given that the PTN and PTPRZ1 loei are relatively close to each other (-15 Mb) on the long arm of human chromosome 7, which, in turn, is frequently amplified in human gliomas, the genomic region including these two genes may well constitute a novel amplicon in human gliomas. In addition, several other genes with higher expression in the P7 cell line (ALK, FGFR1, RNF130 and ROB01) are also expressed at significantly higher levels in certain glioma grades, when compared to non-tumoral human brain tissue samples. Overall, these data indicate that starting from the rat glioma cell lines model, it was possible to obtain, insights applicable to a better understanding of the biology underlying the pathogenesis of human gliomas. Thus, co-expression of multiple autocrine loops seems to be a commonplace in the rat experimental glioma models as well as in the human glioma cell lines and in clinicai samples, where these pathways are potentially interconnected at the transcriptional leveI. Furthermore, we were able to detect increased mRNA expression levels of a novel putative chromatin remodelling factor (CHD7) in human glioma tissue samples, when compared to non-tumoral human brain tissue samples. Taken together, the results obtained in this work may potentially lead to the rational development of novel therapeutic, diagnostic and prognostic strategies for human gliomas. Functional analysis of these genes in glioma, and the pathways modulated by their products, will be a fundamental step for the establishment of these genes as potentially novel therapeutic targets and/or molecular markers. (AU) | |