Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Jair Giampani Junior
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina (FM/SBD) |
| Defense date: | 2004-10-15 |
| Examining board members: |
Remo Susanna Junior;
Alberto Jorge Betinjane;
Francisco Eduardo Lopes de Lima;
Carmo Mandia Júnior
|
| Advisor: | Remo Susanna Junior |
| Abstract | |
The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ahmed glaucoma valve implant surgery combined with partial Tenon\'s capsule resection and mitomycin C administration in neovascular glaucoma patients. Our sample comprised 31 eyes of 30 patients with neovascular glaucoma secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or central retinal vein occlusion. The 30 patients all had visual acuity equal to or greater than their perception of light. The eyes were randomized into two groups: conventional Ahmed valve implant combined with mitomycin C administration (n = 15); and high-resistance Ahmed implant combined with partial Tenon\'s capsule resection and mitomycin C administration (n = 16). Variables were controlled in an attempt to homogenize the groups and thereby avoid any bias in the evaluation of the results. Simple surgical success was defined as ocular pressure equal to or greater than 5 mmHg but less than or equal to 21 mmHg. Median age was 58.06 ± 13.02 (53.20 ± 14.22 in the group not submitted to resection and 62.63 ± 10.23 in the group submitted to partial Tenon\'s capsule resection; p = 0.109). No statistically significant difference between the groups was found related to gender (p = 0.722), operated eye (p = 1.0), cause of neovascular glaucoma (p = 1.0), previous panphotocoagulation (p = 1.0), or preoperative visual acuity (p = 0.154). Mean preoperative ocular pressure was 51.20 ± 11.58 mmHg in the group not submitted to resection and 51 ± 10.05 mmHg in the group submitted to partial Tenon\'s capsule resection (p = 0.889). From the first preoperative day, there was a significant reduction in ocular pressure in both groups. At 24 months after surgery, mean ocular pressure of subjects not submitted and submitted to partial Tenon\'s capsule resection was 19.78 ± 15.71 mmHg and 17.00 ± 12.77 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.820). Mean length of the follow-up period was 23.40 ± 9.62 months in those not submitted to resection and 23.44 ± 9.63 months in the group submitted to partial Tenon\'s capsule resection (p = 0.952). Statistically significant differences in ocular pressure were found between the two groups only on postoperative day 1 and at 3 and 7 months after surgery. In the group not submitted to resection, there was a more marked reduction in visual acuity (p = 0.023*). Simple surgical success was achieved in 53.3% (8) of the eyes in the group not submitted to resection and in 62.5% (10) of the eyes in the group submitted to partial Tenon\'s capsule resection (p = 0.722). There were no pale or transparent blebs in either group during the postoperative phase. The incidence of complications was similar between the two groups, with the exception of the incidence of implant tube exposure, which was four times greater in the group submitted to partial Tenon\'s capsule resection. In conclusion, after a mean follow-up period of 23.42 months, the measures of surgical success were comparable between the two groups. There was significant reduction in visual acuity in both groups, more markedly in the group not submitted to resection. The implant drainage tube became exposed four times more frequently in the group submitted to partial Tenon\'s capsule resection (AU) | |