Genetic and biochemical study of the interaction between the SpoIIE and FtsZ prote...
Functional and structural characterization of the Bacillus's ZapA protein
FtsZ, the main coordinating protein of bacterial cell division: search for new inh...
![]() | |
Author(s): |
Guilherme Louzada Silva Meira
Total Authors: 1
|
Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
Press: | São Paulo. |
Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Conjunto das Químicas (IQ e FCF) (CQ/DBDCQ) |
Defense date: | 2010-06-23 |
Examining board members: |
Frederico José Gueiros Filho;
Rita de Cassia Cafe Ferreira;
Fábio Luís Forti;
Ulysses Garcia Casado Lins;
Aline Maria da Silva
|
Advisor: | Frederico José Gueiros Filho |
Abstract | |
Bacillus subtilis division begins through the formation of a multiprotein complex, the divisome, at the site of division. FtsZ is the earliest known protein to localize to the future division site where the protein forms a ring-like structure (Z-ring) that extends around the circumference of the cell. The Z-ring functions as a scaffold and recruits about fifteen other division proteins that compose the divisome. In this work, we used quantitative and qualitative methods of vital fluorescence microscopy to study two questions that have not been elucidated about the divisome dynamics. The first is how divisome is assembled. To address that problem, we made co-localization between Z-ring (FtsZ-mCherry) and proteins ZapA, EzrA, FtsW, FtsL, YpsB, DivIVA, and MinC fused to GFP. Higher is the match between GFP fusions to Z-ring, earlier is the assembly of division proteins to divisome. Therefore, the co-localization frequency between Z ring and divisome proteins will allow us to deduce the assemble kinetics of the divisome. This assays showed a co-localization frequency of 97,33% for ZapA; 98,31% for EzrA; 83,90 for FtsW; 78,43% for FtsL; 50% for YpsB; 41,7% for DivIVA and 31,64% for MinC. This data suggests that the divisome does not assemble in two but in three steps. ZapA and EzrA assemble into the divisome immediately after Z ring formation, secondly FtsW and FtsL were recruited to the divisome, and finally YpsB, DivIVA, MinC associated with the divisome. The second question that we investigated in this work is the mechanism responsible for change the divisome position that occurs during sporulation in B. subtilis. In sporulation the cell divides asymmetrically, with a septum formation near poles. During vegetative grown the divisiome does not occur near poles because of MinC, MinD and DivIVA action, relevant for spatial regulation of division. MinCD and DivIVA are inhibitors of Z ring formation that during vegetative growth are located at poles. A hypothesis to explain the use of polar sites for division during sporulation would be that MinCD and DivIVA would be removed from cellular poles. To test this hypothesis, we studied the location of MinCD and DivIVA proteins during sporulation. Our results demonstrated that MinCD and DivIVA re-localize and leave to cell poles during sporulation. However this process occurs after asymmetric Z ring formation, suggesting that Z ring would be unresponsive to this inhibitors during sporulation. Through genetics assays in B. subtilis we demonstrated that SpoIIE protein, known to probably play a role in asymmetric septum formation, would be able to contrapose MinC action during early sporulation. Therefore, we propose a novel model for change the symmetric to asymmetric division during sporulation, unlike the release of MinCD from pole proposed in the literature. (AU) |