Serum amyloid A (SAA) and cancer: biological effects and mechanisms of action in glioblastomas multiformes

Author(s)

Franciele Hinterholz Knebel

• Document type: Doctoral Thesis
• Press: São Paulo.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Conjunto das Químicas (IQ e FCF) (CQ/DBDCQ)
• Defense date: 2014-09-30

Examining board members

Ana Campa; Alison Colquhoun; Vilma Regina Martins

• Advisor: Ana Campa

Abstract

Tumor cells have their proliferation and migration modified by several growth factors, cytokines and inflammatory mediators, such as serum amyloid A (SAA). Previous studies from our group showed the direct effect of SAA on proliferation, migration and invasion of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells, A172 and T98G. In this study we complemented previous migration and invasion data; evaluated SAA as possible inducer of MMP-2, -9 and ROS; performed clonogenic assay to investigate a possible contribution of rSAA in the early stage of tumor development; evaluated the impact of hypoxia on the expression of different genes of SAA; stimulated the cells with classics inducers of hepatic SAA and analyzed the possibility of these different genes to induce SAA in tumor cells; evaluated possible receptors and signaling pathways involved in proliferation, migration and invasion processes. SAA knockdowns (KDs) were made for acute phase (SAA1 and 2) and constitutive protein (SAA4) and evaluated their role in cell proliferation, migration, morfology and invasion. Finally it was investigated SAA as a possible biomarker of glioma grade in clinical samples. Our results suggest that rSAA affects MMP-2 and -9 activity and ROS production in both GBM, but did not affect clonogenicity. IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β, but not hypoxia, were able to induce SAA expression. rSAA addition to cell cultures stimulated transcription of the three different SAA genes, suggesting the activation of intracellular feedback mechanisms. Pro-tumor effects of rSAA seem to occur via RAGE and anti-tumor effects appear to be induced via TLR-4. This was de first time that induction of RAGE triggered by rSAA was shown. Proliferation, migration and invasion were inhibited in SAA KDs, suggesting that SAA is an important tumoral product for the maintenance of the invasive phenotype of GBM. The addition of exogenous SAA largely reversed the effects on SAA KDs T98G cells, whereas SAA KDs A172 cells partially responded to the rSAA. The findings with SAA KDs suggest that SAA affect cell morphology. Another new contribution from our study was that SAA4, a constitutive gene with unknown function, was important for the proliferation, migration and invasion of GBM and it can be induced by rSAA, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β. We speculate that the different effects induced by rSAA in GBM are associated with the affinity of SAA to different receptors and the different genetic backgrounds of GBM. Patients with GBM showed a significant increase in the transcription and expression of SAA1 in tumor tissue as well as increased serum SAA. The correlation between the expression of SAA1 with important molecules for tumor progression, such as CXCR4, CXCR7, CD163 and HIF-1α also identified SAA as a protein associated with malignancy. (AU)