A new proposal for the progesterone control of Luteinizing Hormone surge during proestrus

Author(s)

Fernanda Vieira Rodovalho Callegari

• Document type: Doctoral Thesis
• Press: Ribeirão Preto.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (PCARP/BC)
• Defense date: 2008-12-04

Examining board members

Janete Aparecida Anselmo Franci; Rita de Cassia Meneghatti Dornelles; Paula Andrea de Albuquerque Salles Navarro; Adelina Martha dos Reis; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá

• Advisor: Janete Aparecida Anselmo Franci

Abstract

It is well known that the occurrence of preovulatory surge on proestrus depends on estradiol pre-exposure followed by the acute action of progesterone, a hormone responsible for both the onset and amplitude of this peak. However the origin of progesterone during this period is not clear yet. While some authors argue that the adrenals contribute significantly to preovulatory progesterone, others consider the ovary as the main source. The origin of progesterone that regulates the LH preovulatory surge is not clear. Therefore, we determined here the profile and the source of progesterone secretion during proestrus and its relationship with the LH preovulatory surge. At 7:00h of the proestrus day, female rats were either submitted to jugular vein cannulation (control) or to cannulation followed by ovariectomy (OVX), adrenalectomy (ADX), or sham surgery (Sham). Blood samples were collected every 15 minutes between 11 and 13:45 h for progesterone, estradiol and corticosterone measurements and hourly between 14 and 19 h for progesterone, estradiol and corticosterone and LH measurements. Also, to betterunderstand the pattern of adrenal progesterone secretion and to verify if estrogen can modulate this secretion, seven-day ovariectomized rats were treated with corn oil (OVO) or 17-?estradiol (OVE) for 3 days. One, two, or three days after the last injection, blood samples were withdrawn as described above. Since no difference was observed between the control and Sham groups with regard to the preovulatory LH surge, the number of oocytes or the plasma concentration of LH, progesterone, estradiol and corticosterone, data from these groups were presented as a single group called Control. Upon proestrus, estradiol secretion was similar between Control and ADX groups and significantly decreased in OVX group. As expected, corticosterone secretion was completely abolished in ADX group, while it was similar between the Control and OVX groups. In all groups basal progesterone levels were around 2pg/mL. In Control group, we observed a significant increase in progesterone secretion, around 12-13h (surge 1: from 3.5 ± 1.1 to 22.3 ± 2.7 ng/mL) and after 15h a second progesterone surge (surge 2: from 10.5 ± 2.2 to 43.0 ± 2.5 ng/mL) as well as LH surge (25.4 ± 2.4 ng/mL). OVX group failed to present surge 2 of progesterone (from 5.7 ± 2.2 to 6.5 ± 1.2 ng/mL), but LH surge (26.5 ± 3.9 ng/mL) was identical to that of Control group. In these rats, surge 1 was attenuated to 12.3 ± 1.9 ng/mL. Both progesterone surges 1 and 2 as well as LH surge were absent in ADX group (surge 1: from 2.0 ± 0.3 to 4.5 ± 0,7 ng/mL; surge 2: from 2.2 ± 0.4 to 8.9 ± 3.6 ng/mL).In OVX rats, treated or not with estradiol, a surge of similar magnitude of progesterone (probably fromadrenal) was observed around noon (OVO: 19.0 ± 5.7 ng/mL; OVE: 22.9 ± 5.3 ng/mL). We may conclude that 1) the surge 1 of progesterone is from the adrenal glands and is important for the LH; 2) this surge seems to be circadian since the OVX rats displays a daily rhythm of progesterone secretion, with a surge around 12 h; 3) the surge 2 of progesterone surge originates from the ovary and isnot required for the genesis of the LH surge; 4) there is a potential crosstalk between the ovary and the adrenal gland. in a way that ovary influences adrenal progesterone secretion and 5) the adrenal progesterone secretion is not influenced by estradiol levels. (AU)