Prognostic Value of dobutamine and adenosine stress echocardiography associated with real time myocardial perfusion in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Author(s)

Angele Azevedo Alves

• Document type: Doctoral Thesis
• Press: São Paulo.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina (FM/SBD)
• Defense date: 2010-08-26

Examining board members

Wilson Mathias Júnior; Orlando Campos Filho; Roberto Alexandre Franken; Roberto Rocha Corrêa Veiga Giraldez; Eduardo Arantes Nogueira

• Advisor: Wilson Mathias Júnior

Abstract

Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) permits simultaneous analysis of wall motion (WM) and qualitative myocardial perfusion (QMP) beyond quantification of myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR). Although quantitative RTMCE has been demonstrated to improve the accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD), its prognostic value is unknown. We sought to determine the prognostic value of transient changes in myocardial WM, QMP and myocardial blood flow during adenosine and dobutamine stress RTMCE in patients with known or suspected CAD and to identify among the parameters, the best predictor of outcome. We studied 227 patients who underwent adenosine stress RTMCE and 168 patients who underwent dobutamine stress RTMCE with low-mechanical index pulse sequence schemes following intravenous infusion of contrast agent. The replenishment velocity reserve () and an index of myocardial blood flow (Anx) were derived from quantitative RTMCE using Q-Lab software. reserve and MBFR reserve was determined as the ratio of values obtained during adenosine/dobutamine and baseline. The study end points were primary outcomes which included: cardiac death, myocardial infarction and unstable angina; and secondary outcomes: which included coronary bypass or angioplasty. During a median follow-up of 32 months - adenosine and 34 months-dobutamine (5 days-6,9years), 46 events occurred adenosine (2 death, 6 nonfatal myocardial infarctions and 11 unstable angina) and 38 events ocurred-dobutamine (3 death, 3 nonfatal myocardial infarctions and 11 unstable angina). By receiver operator characteristics curve, the cut-off value of were 2.1 and 2.45 and of MBRF were 2.26 and 2.78, for adenosine and dobutamine respectively. WM and QMP analysis were independent predictors of total events by adenosine stress RTMCE (RR,2.8,95%,p=0.003 and RR4.3,95%,p<0.001, respectively) but not for primary events. However, were independent predictors of total events (RR,3.3,95%, p=0.002 and RR6.7,95%, p<.001, respectively) and primary events (RR3.3,95%, p=0.024 and RR3.7,95%, p=0.018, respectively) for dobutamine stress RTMCE. Quantitative parameters, both and Ax reserves added even more prognostic value over other variables during adenosine stress RTMCE for total events (RR,16.5,95%, p<0.001 and RR7.9, 95%, p<0.001, respectively), and these parameters were the only predictors of primary events in this group (RR,8.7,95%,p=0.005 and RR5.9,95%, p=0.023) when this parameters were abnormal in two or more coronary territories. These parameters added even more prognostic value over other variables during dobutamine stress RTMCE (RR,23.7,95%, p<0.001 and RR,16,95%,p<0.001, respectively), however, only reserve but not Ax reserve was good and independent predictor of primary events in this group (RR,21,95%,p=0.003) when this parameter was abnormal in two or more coronary territories . In conclusion, the quantitative parameters obtained from adenosine and dobutamine stress Real Time Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography have independent and additional prognostic information over wall motion analysis and qualitative myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. And, the quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion, in particular with the B parameter, identifies a subgroup with greater risk for cardiovascular events (those patients with abnormal reserves in two or more coronary territories) (AU)