Patriline effect on the activation of the ovary and production of drones in queenless workers of Apis mellifera.

Author(s)

Gustavo Rodrigues Makert dos Santos

• Document type: Master's Dissertation
• Press: Ribeirão Preto. , gráficos, ilustrações, tabelas.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (PCARP/BC)
• Defense date: 2002-04-29

Examining board members

Klaus Hartfelder; Maria Cristina Arias; Marco Antonio Del Lama

• Advisor: Klaus Hartfelder
• Field of knowledge: Biological Sciences - Genetics
• Indexed in: Banco de Dados Bibliográficos da USP-DEDALUS; Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações - USP
• Location: Universidade de São Paulo. Biblioteca Central do Campus de Ribeirão Preto; FMRP/Santos, Gustavo R. Makert dos

Abstract

A honeybee queen normally mates with 10-20 drones. Mean kinship relations, therefore, attain quite distinct values when comparing kinship between workers within the same patriline (r=0,75) to the corresponding values for workers between different patrilines (r=0,29). This discrepancy results in conflicts with respect to reproductive interests. In the present study, we employed microsatellites as molecular markers to approach this sociogenetic question in two honey bee nuclei. In detail, we asked whether differences in ovary activation, previously observed in queenless workers, can be attributed to patriline differences. Additionally, we asked whether differences in ovariole numbers in worker bees also correlate with their patriline genotype. We obtained the following results: Utilizing microsatellite primer A88 and A24 we could distinguish a minimum of 14 different worker patrilines in the two nuclei. The two maternal alleles for nuclei 65 and 67 were identified from the genotypes of the queen’s sons. We could distinguish at least 20 different patrilines in the sons of queenless workers in nucleus 65, and 14 patrilines in the sons of queenless workers in nucleus 67. Analyzing the degree of ovary activation in 15 and 21-day-old queenless workers, we detected differences in ovary status between the two nuclei. When correlating the degree of ovary activation and number of ovarioles in marked queenless workers, we were able to detect patrilines whose ovary status and ovarioles number was low (patrilines with the alleles 4/1, 4/2, 4/3, 4/4 - microsatellites A88/A24), in contrast, there were also patrilines where both parameters were high (especially in patriline with the alleles 2/4). It was exactly these patrilines which produced most offspring (drones) after queen removal. And finally, by Fisher’s exact test, we could show that these representation differences before and after orphanhood did not occur randomly. These results show the high efficiency of the methodology used, and made it possible to demonstrate that there are genetic differences in the probability of workers to become egg layers. (AU)