Endoscopic evaluation of dogs with inflammatory bowel disease: correlation with clinical, laboratory and histopathological scores

Author(s)

Leda Marques de Oliveira Barros

• Document type: Doctoral Thesis
• Press: São Paulo.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ/SBD)
• Defense date: 2012-11-30

Examining board members

Julia Maria Matera; José Luiz Catão Dias; Ana Luiza Werneck da Silva; Ricardo Duarte Silva; Angelo João Stopiglia

• Advisor: Julia Maria Matera

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to diagnose inflammatory bowel disease in dogs with gastrointestinal signs as well as to evaluate the contribution of different parameters used in the diagnosis of this disease. Twenty dogs with compatible signs of the disease were included in the study (affected group) and compared with 20 healthy animals (control group). Clinical scores were assigned and endoscopic and histopathological analysis were performed in affected animals. Samples of blood and feces were collected from both groups, stored at -80°C and then used to measure TNF-alpha, C-reactive protein, calprotectin, S100A12 protein, folate and cobalamin. Seric albumin median level was 3.17g/dL and only one animal had hypoalbuminemia. All endoscopic evaluations showed some degree of change in the assessed parameters, and hyperemia and edema were the most frequently ones observed. In the histopathological evaluation, lymphocytic plasmocytic process was the most frequently diagnosed (12 out 17 gastric conditions, nine out 15 duodenal conditions and nine out 11 colonic conditions). When analyzing the scores assigned to the gastric parameters, 67.3% of the evaluations were considered normal, while 27.4% presented slight alterations. For duodenal fragments, 55.3% of the evaluations showed normal tissue, while 36.0% were considered slightly altered. Regarding the colon, only 38.6% of these parameters were normal, whereas 45.4% of the evaluations presented slight changes. The median of the scores assigned to the stomach, duodenum and colon were 3, 3 and 6, respectively. The comparison of the Creactive protein values between affected and control groups showed statistical difference. This difference was also significant when comparing the control group to affected I and affected II subgroups. Although seric values of calprotectin werent statistically significant, fecal data statistically differed between the groups. Regarding seric protein S100A12 measurement, the median values of both groups were similar (195.90 mg/L and 195.55 mg/L for the affected and control groups, respectively) and the difference between these values was not statistically significant. The comparison between fecal S100A12 protein values didnt showed a significant difference. Folate and cobalamin measurements showed no statistical difference when comparing healthy and affected animals. A direct positive correlation was found between C-reactive protein and clinical score. C-reactive protein and histopathological score of colon, albumin and fecal calprotectin, albumin and fecal protein S100A12, seric protein S100A12 and seric calprotetin and fecal protein S100A12 and fecal calprotectin were correlated. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 09/00615-0 - Endoscopic evaluation of dogs with intestinal bowel disease: correlations with clinical, laboratorial and histopathological parameters
• Grantee: Leda Marques de Oliveira Barros
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate