Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Study of plastidial FtsH proteases targeting to thylakoid membranes

Full text
Author(s):
Ricardo Augusto de Oliveira Rodrigues
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Doctoral Thesis
Press: Piracicaba.
Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALA/BC)
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Daniel Scherer de Moura; Lazaro Eustaquio Pereira Peres; Luis Lamberti Pinto da Silva; Marie Anne van Sluys; Victor Alexandre Vitorello
Advisor: Marcio de Castro Silva Filho
Abstract

The Arabidopsis thylakoid FtsH protease complex is composed of FtsH1/FtsH5 (type A) and FtsH2/FtsH8 (type B) subunits. Type A and type B subunits display a high degree of sequence identity throughout their mature domains, but no similarity in their amino-terminal targeting peptide regions. In chloroplast import assays, FtsH2 and FtsH5 were imported and subsequently integrated into thylakoids by a two-step processing mechanism that resulted in an amino-proximal lumenal domain, a single transmembrane anchor, and a carboxyl proximal stromal domain. FtsH2 integration into washed thylakoids was entirely dependent on the proton gradient, whereas FtsH5 integration was dependent on NTPs, suggesting their integration by Tat and Sec pathways, respectively. This finding was corroborated by in organello competition and by antibody inhibition experiments. The amino proximal domains through the transmembrane anchors were sufficient for proper integration. The mature FtsH2 protein was found to be incompatible with the Sec machinery as determined with targeting peptide-swapping experiments. Incompatibility does not appear to be determined by any specific element in the FtsH2 domain as no single domain was incompatible with Sec transport. This suggests an incompatible structure that requires the intact FtsH2. That the highly homologous type A and type B subunits of the same multimeric complex use different integration pathways is a striking example of the notion that membrane insertion pathways have evolved to accommodate structural features of their respective substrates. The regulation mechanism which governs the Arabidopsis FtsH complexs activity is still unknown, but it is proposed the presence of additional factors. For this reason, the plastidial Arabidopsis FtsH5 was used as bait in a yeast two hybrid screening. The screening resulted in 48 colonies that activated the histidine and adenine reporter genes. Among all the sequenced cDNAs we have found a potential candidate named FIP (FtsH5 Interacting Protein). GST Pull-Down experiments also indicate an interaction between FtsH5 and FIP. Radiolabeled FIP was incubated with intact isolated chloroplasts. After incubation, intact chloroplasts were lysated and separated into stroma and thylakoids. FIP remained associated exclusively with the thylakoid membrane fraction. The insertion into membrane was verified throughout resistance to alkali treatment and the thylakoid protease treated fraction resulted in a protected fragment, characteristic of membrane-inserted proteins. Agroinfiltrated Nicotiana tabacum leaves with a FtsH5::GFP construct resulted that the chimeric gene was targeted to chloroplasts. Thus, as FtsH5, FIP is a plastidial protein which is located into thylakoid membrane. Blue native gels using radiolabeled FIP protein show that it runs associated with a complex around 450 kDa, which is the expected size for the Arabidopsis FtsH thylakoidal complex. As FtsH proteins present both ATPase and protease domains, we believe that FIP can somehow modulates the activity of the thylakoidal FtsH complex. (AU)