Mapping QTLs on chicken chromosome 19, 23, 24, 26, 27 and 28 affecting performance traits

Author(s)

Marcel Ambo

• Document type: Master's Dissertation
• Press: Piracicaba.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALA/BC)
• Defense date: 2007-08-29

Examining board members

Luiz Lehmann Coutinho; Ana Silvia Alves Meira Tavares Moura; Luciana Correia de Almeida Regitano

• Advisor: Luiz Lehmann Coutinho

Abstract

With the objective of mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for economically valuable characteristics, an F2 chicken population was developed by crossing a broiler sire line and a layer dam line. A total of 2.063 F2 chickens from 17 incubations were reared as broilers and slaughtered at 6 week of age, when six performance traits were measured. Five families were chosen for this study based on previous work to determine the most informative families. Twenty markers from chromosomes 19, 23, 24, 26, 27 and 28 were tested in the parental and F1 chickens from the chosen families to select the informative markers. After genotyping parental, F1 and F2 chickens, the linkage maps were constructed and QTL Interval mapping analysis was conducted for each chromosome using regression methods and the F2 genetic model. Two different models were tested: one including only the additive effect of the QTL and another model that also included the dominance effect. If at least a genome-wide suggestive QTL was detected, they were compared through standard F tests to confirm the dominance effect of the QTL. Complementary analyses were conducted to investigate the existence of QTL x sex and QTL x family interactions. The percentage of the phenotypic variance explained by the QTL and the confidence intervals were estimated for each QTL. A 5% chromosome-wide significant QTL for weight gain from 35 to 41 d was mapped to chromosome 26 and a QTL that exceeded the genome-wide suggestive threshold for body weight at 35 d was mapped to chromosome 27. This QTL positioned at 103 cM explained 2.03% of the phenotypic variance of the trait and presented a confidence interval from 0 to 111 cM. (AU)