Study of the phenomena that occur during the annealing of worked AISI 304L and 316L austenitic stainless steels deformed at various temperatures.

Author(s)

Clara Inés Herrera Pulgarín

• Document type: Doctoral Thesis
• Press: São Paulo.
• Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Escola Politécnica (EP/BC)
• Defense date: 2006-03-16

Examining board members

Angelo Fernando Padilha; Margareth Spangler Andrade; Fernando Jose Gomes Landgraf; Nelson Batista de Lima; Paulo Rangel Rios

• Advisor: Angelo Fernando Padilha

Abstract

Hot rolled AISI 304L and 316L austenitic stainless steel sheets, 6mm thick, presented recrystallized equiaxial grains with austenite and islands of delta ferrite, in larger quantities mainly in the center of both steel sheets. The austenite had a weak texture, with a gradient through the thickness. The solution annealing eliminated delta ferrite, however it did not change the texture. Phenomena such as work hardening and strain induced α’ martensite formation showed strong dependency on the chemistry composition and rolling temperature. The rolling texture observed in AISI 304L and 316L austenitic stainless steels is characteristic of FCC materials with low and medium stacking fault energy (SFE), after cold rolling. The α’ reversion temperature was around 550°C for both steels and was independent of the volume fraction of α’ martensite. The AISI 316L showed a strong recrystallization resistance as it has higher SFE and smaller work hardening than the AISI 304L. The recrystallization start temperature is approximately 150°C higher than the α’ reversion temperature. The rolling temperature did not influence the recrystallization temperature. Recrystallization texture for both steels remained similar to the rolling texture. Proper thermal and mechanical treatments provided interesting combinations of mechanical properties for both steels, such as yield strength around 1000 MPa with 10% elongation. These results suggest that the obtained austenitic stainless steels provide attractive combinations not only with high mechanical resistance but also with reasonable toughness and ductility. Through thermo-mechanical treatments, two point must be stressed: i) during the deformation great quantities of α’ martensite are being produced due to the SFE of the steel and the degree and the temperature of deformation; ii) during the annealing treatment of the work hardened material the α’martensite reverts to austenite, but complete recrystallization must be avoided, thus strict control of temperature and annealing time must be ensured to obtain a refined microstructure (of grains and subgrains). The possibilities of employing successive deformation / annealing treatments is promising and should be explored in future research. Several microstructural characterization techniques have been employed: optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), magnetic measurements, X-ray diffraction to analyze phases and textures, and Vickers microhardness tests. Mechanical characterization involved tensile testing at different temperatures, with determination of yield strength, tensile strength, total elongation and strain hardening coefficient n. (AU)