Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Arthur Guimarães Carvalho Porto
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Master's Dissertation |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Instituto de Biociências (IBIOC/SB) |
| Defense date: | 2009-04-24 |
| Examining board members: |
Gabriel Henrique Marroig Zambonato;
Diego Astúa de Moraes;
Denise Selivon Scheepmaker
|
| Advisor: | Gabriel Henrique Marroig Zambonato |
| Abstract | |
Morphological integration refers to the modular structuring of intertrait relationships in an organism, which could bias the direction and rate of morphological change, either constraining or facilitating evolution along certain dimensions of the morphospace. Therefore, the description of morphological integration patterns and its magnitude and the analysis of their evolutionary consequences are central to understand the evolution of complex traits. Here we analyze morphological integration in the skull of several mammalian orders, addressing the following questions: are there common patterns of inter-trait relationships? Are these patterns compatible with hypotheses based on shared development and function? What kind of responses to evolutionary forces could be generated by these patterns? We digitized more than 2000 specimens in 20 mammalian orders and 40 families. We then estimated the correspondent correlation and covariance matrices among traits and compared those matrices among the families. We also compared observed patterns of integration to theoretical expectations based on common development and function. Finally, we analyzed the responses of each covariance matrix to simulated selection vectors. Our results pointed to a largely shared pattern of inter-trait correlations, implying that mammalian skull diversity has been produced using a common covariance structure that remained similar for at least 65 million years. Comparisons with a rodent genetic variance/covariance matrix suggest that this broad similarity extends also to the genetic factors underlying phenotypic variation. Several morphological modules expected from shared development and function were detected in the mammalian taxa studied. The main differences among groups were found for the magnitudes of integration: metatherians and two rodent families presented higher overall levels of integration and reduced modular distinctiveness ,while primates and chiropterans exhibited the opposite pattern. Our data constitute evidence that the broad picture of mammalian skull evolution could be regarded as a history of inter-module disintegration, while the modules themselves became more clearly marked. The evolutionary implication of these findings is that groups with lower overall integration are less evolutionarily constrained, and are able to cope with selection with more flexibility. (AU) | |