Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Helbert Medeiros Prado
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Instituto de Biociências (IBIOC/SB) |
| Defense date: | 2012-06-18 |
| Examining board members: |
Rui Sergio Sereni Murrieta;
Cristina Adams;
Adriano Garcia Chiarello;
Louis Carlos Forline;
Glenn Harvey Shepard Junior
|
| Advisor: | Rui Sergio Sereni Murrieta |
| Abstract | |
Ethnoecology deals with the relations between humans and the natural environment, which includes the study of the local ecological knowledge (LEK) concerning interactions among species between species and the environment. The study\'s main thematic interests center upon understanding how LEK is built and shared, how it changes in the face of processes of modernization experienced by rural populations, and how it corroborates and/or contradicts normative scientific knowledge. This thesis is an ethnoecological study that focuses primarily on (1) comparisons between LEK and normative scientific knowledge, and (2) the relevance of different landscape elements in the formation of LEK repertoires. In this study, LEK is analyzed in terms of the existing body of local knowledge concerning ecological aspects of the large mammals in the Atlantic Forest. The study was carried out in three quilombolas communities in the Ribeira Valley (São Paulo, Brazil). These communities originated from maroon colonies formed by runaway and abandoned slaves some two centuries ago. These settlers lived off the Atlantic Forest, adopting the shifting cultivation system known as coivara, a common form of subsistence agriculture in the Tropics. This practice of coivara largely determined the composition and configuration of the local landscape such as it is today. Local Ecological Knowledge was gathered through semi-structured and structured interviews and free-listing, covering such issues as species diet and habitat use. The scientific knowledge on these same diets, which was used as a parameter of comparison with the LEK, was gleaned through a review of the ecological literature on the theme. Data on habitat use was gathered in situ using camera trapping technique. Results of ecological and ethnoecological interest were obtained. Significant methodological limitations were identified during the critical review of studies on Neotropical ungulate diets, providing a basis for reflection in future studies. Regarding habit use by fauna, in situ observation showed that secondary forest (old swidden plots) proved just as attractive to most of the species as did mature forest. These results, combined with the findings of previous researches emphasizing the material and cultural importance of coivara and its relatively low impact on the landscape, underline the disproportionate vigor with which the practice has been discouraged by environmental organs. In the field of ethnoecology, this thesis shows that the levels of local consensus and LEK convergence with the scientific knowledge varied depending on the ecological aspects considered for the species in question, such as diet, habitat use and foraging habits (diurnal/nocturnal). Comparison with the scientific knowledge, with focus on the different landscape elements, revealed greater relevance of the environmental context of secondary forest (regrowth), cultivated plots and homegardens in the formation of this local knowledge repertoire. Over the course of the last three decades, the study populations have experienced a series of transformations brought about by agglomeration in semi-urbanized villages and the near-total abandonment of the coivara system as the mainstay of local agricultural practice. Seen as the younger generations have had far less exposure to the traditional practice than their elders, it is reasonable to assume that the LEK they possess will yield an increasingly limited repertoire in comparison with that currently preserved by the older generations. (AU) | |