Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Development of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in small-for gestational-age newborns assessed by sweep visual evoked potentials

Full text
Author(s):
Valtenice de Cássia Rodrigues de Matos França
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Doctoral Thesis
Press: São Paulo.
Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Instituto de Psicologia (IP/SBD)
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Marcelo Fernandes da Costa; Albert Bousso; Edna Maria de Albuquerque Diniz; Natanael Antonio dos Santos; Dora Selma Fix Ventura
Advisor: Marcelo Fernandes da Costa; Russell David Hamer
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the development of cortical grating acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) in term infants born small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: Using the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP; Norcia & Tyler 1985), we measured cortical VA and CS in 126 term infants. Seventy-three (average age = 11.3 ± 4.34 weeks) were born with birthweight within normal limits (> 10th percentile; Alexander et al., 1996). 53 infants were born SGA (average age = 9.2 ± 3.8 weeks). sVEPs were measured using the PowerDiva system (Norcia & Tyler, 1985; Chen et al., 2005) which generated the stimuli and analyzed the evoked responses. The sVEP was recorded using 3 unipolar channels placed at O1, Oz, and O2 with a reference electrode at the vertex. Stimuli were vertical sinewave luminance gratings phase-reversing at 6 Hz with a mean luminance of 161 cd/m2. To measure VA, spatial frequency (SF) was swept linearly from low to high during a 10-second trial, generating ten 1-sec time bins of sVEP data. Grating contrast was fixed at 80% during the SF sweep. To evaluate CS, SF was fixed at 0.5 c/deg, and contrast was increased logarithmically across 10 1-sec recording epochs. The resulting sVEP data from both protocols were based on a vector average of a minimum of 3 sVEP trials. In addition to thresholds, we analyzed average noise (Nav), and 4 suprathreshold measures - peak amplitude (Apeak), signal-to-noise ratio at Apeak (SNRpeak), phase at Apeak (peak) and slope of the rising phase of the sVEP (m). The data used were those obtained from the recording channel generating the highest VA or CS while satisfying strict phase and amplitude criteria to ensure that the responses were reliable and significantly above the noise. Results: A Chi-squared test showed that a significant proportion of the young ( 9 weeks) SGA infants had values of VA and CS that were below the mean of control infants (with birthweights above the international 50th percentile). In addition, mean Nav, Apeak and SNRpeak for the whole group of SGA infants were below the means of control infants across the whole age range tested. A factorial ANOVA confirmed that VA, CS, Nav and all the suprathreshold measures underwent significant development; that is, the mean values prior to 10 weeks were significantly different than the mean values between 10 and 24 weeks. In addition, the rate of development of peak was similar for the two groups as well as to prior phase-development data Hamer and Norcia (1994). Conclusions: Birth at term with weight small for gestational age appears to significantly affect development of both cortical grating acuity and contrast sensitivity for low-SF gratings. Effects on thresholds are most evident in the first 2 months. Moreover, the significant effects we found in Nav and suprathreshold amplitudes throughout the first 6 months of life show that, even if acuity and contrast thresholds are not affected, significant neuronal effects occur in the visual pathways leading to the sVEP signal (Mirabella et al., 2006) (AU)