Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


In vitro assessment of cisplatin, in lymphocytes of patients with cutaneous melanoma, using cytogenetic tests

Full text
Author(s):
Fernanda Shimabukuro
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Master's Dissertation
Press: São Paulo.
Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Medicina (FM/SBD)
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Gilka Jorge Figaro Gattas; Ilce Mara de Syllos Colus; Daisy Maria Fávero Salvadori
Advisor: Gilka Jorge Figaro Gattas
Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma is a malignant tumor originated from epidermal melanocytes, highly invasive and aggressive, with high mortality, and incidence that has been increasing over the years. The treatment for melanoma is surgery and patients with metastasis may receive chemotherapy with cisplatin, that results in DNA adducts that alters the replication process in cancer cells. It is suggested that the DNA repair systems have an important role in the etiology of melanoma (risk due to deficient repair) and treatment efficiency (removal of DNA adducts can decrease the treatment results). The prior identification of the response of melanoma patients to treatment with cisplatin may be an important biological marker in clinical oncology. The aim of this study was to assess, in peripheral blood lymphocytes from melanoma patients and controls, the DNA damage before and after the addition of cisplatin (10?M, 100?M and 250?M), in vitro, and estimate the capacity of DNA repair after drug removal (1h, 2.5h and 5h). The micronucleus test (MN - basal DNA damage) and the Comet assay (basal DNA damage, action of cisplatin and DNA repair) were used for the evaluation. Cytogenetic analysis was performed in 20 melanoma patients (10 men and 10 women, average age 50.6 ± 5.9 years old) and 19 controls (9 men and 10 women, average age 49.9 ± 5.5 years old) who also answered a questionnaire on habits and types of exposure to risk factors for melanoma. The frequency of basal DNA damage by the MN test and the Comet assay in lymphocytes from patients (MN = 1.2 ± 1.2 and Comet = 59.3 ± 62.5) was nearly twice the observed in controls (MN = 0, 6 ± 1.0 and Comet = 35.3 ± 18.6), although the difference between the groups in both tests was not considered statistically significant (p = 0.23 and p = 0.85, respectively). The in vitro treatment with cisplatin, compared with the basal DNA damage, increased the frequency of Comets in the three studied concentrations (10?M, 100?M and 250?M) for patients (65.50 ± 50.06, 72.74 ± 50.89 and 77.26 ± 44.16) and for the controls (66.53 ± 49.85, 66.53 ± 26.33 and 81.74 ± 43.12) and the difference was statistically significant only for the control group, for all cisplatin concentrations (p = 0.0175, p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Considering the different repair times (1h, 2.5h and 5h), after removal of cisplatin at different concentrations, there was an increase in the mean frequency of Comets for both melanoma patients (93.88 ± 33.7, 101.75 ± 35.7 and 99.31 ± 32.30) and for the controls (92.45 ± 38.4, 100.82 ± 38.8 and 100.81 ± 31.7), and the difference was statistically significant when the repair Comet score was compared to the basal DNA damage observed in patients (p <0.001) and controls (p <0.001). Similar results were observed when the Comet scores of repair times were compared to the Comet scores obtained after treatment with cisplatin in patients (71.09 ± 48.2, p <= 0.005) and controls (71.59 ± 40.5, p <= 0.005). The results seem to indicate a similar pattern of response to cisplatin and DNA repair in both groups of subjects evaluated. The period of incubation of the cells after cisplatin removal and the number of individuals studied may have influenced the results. The lymphocytes\' response, in vitro, to cisplatin may not be representative of the in vivo effect of tumor cell. However, the identification of markers of response to treatment with chemotherapy from peripheral blood lymphocytes may be an important research strategy in clinical practice, including melanoma. (AU)