Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Discoveing knowledge rules with multiobjective evolutionary computing

Full text
Author(s):
Rafael Giusti
Total Authors: 1
Document type: Master's Dissertation
Press: São Carlos.
Institution: Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação (ICMC/SB)
Defense date:
Examining board members:
Gustavo Enrique de Almeida Prado Alves Batista; Estevam Rafael Hruschka Junior; Solange Oliveira Rezende
Advisor: Gustavo Enrique de Almeida Prado Alves Batista
Abstract

Machine Learning algorithms are notable examples of Artificial Intelligence algorithms capable of automating the extraction of implicit knowledge from datasets. In particular, Symbolic Learning algorithms are those which yield an intelligible knowledge model, i.e., one which a user may easily read. The usage of Symbolic Learning is particularly common within the context of classification, which involves the extraction of knowledge such that the associated model describes correelation among a set of attributes named the premises and one specific attribute named the class. Classification algorithms usually target into creating knowledge models which maximize the measures of coverage and precision, leading to classifiers that tend to be generic and precise. Althought this constitutes a good approach to creating models that automate the decision making process, it may not yield equally good results when the user wishes to extract a knowledge model which could assist them into getting a better understanding of the domain. Having that in mind, it has been established as the main goal of this Masters thesis the research of multi-objective evolutionary computing methods to create individual knowledge rules maximizing sets of arbitrary user-defined criteria. This is achieved by employing the class library and knowledge rule construction environment ECLE, which had been developed during previous research work. A second goal of this Masters thesis is the comparison of the researched evolutionary computing methods against previously existing ranking composition methods in ECLE. It is shown in this Masters thesis that the employment of multi-objective evolutionary computing methods produces better results than those produced by the employment of ranking composition-based methods. This improvement is verified both in terms of solution dominance and proximity of the solution set to the Pareto-optimal front and in terms of Pareto-front diversity. Both criteria are important for evaluating the efficiency of multi-objective optimization algorithms, for the goal of multi-objective optimization is to provide a broad range of efficient solutions, so the user may pick one or more solutions which present the best trade-off among all objectives (AU)

FAPESP's process: 07/06305-7 - Interesting Knowledge Rule Discovery using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Computing
Grantee:Rafael Giusti
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master