Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Ana Irene Fonseca Mendes
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Master's Dissertation |
| Press: | Ribeirão Preto. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (PCARP/BC) |
| Defense date: | 2001-07-11 |
| Examining board members: |
Sergio Sheiji Fukusima;
Luciano da Fontoura Costa;
Jose Aparecido da Silva
|
| Advisor: | Sergio Sheiji Fukusima |
| Abstract | |
Three experiments were carried out to investigate whether the filling-in in the blind spot can distort perceived size. In these experiments, the method of constant stimuli was applied to map the blind spot of the right eye; the lengths of the bars could never intercept the blind spot, intercept it partially or intercept it totally; and the PEST method was applied to determine the point of subjective equality, and then, the constant error. In Experiment I, the lengths of two horizontal bars were compared at the level of fixation point of the right eye under monocular viewing conditions. These bars were presented simultaneously for 100, 300 or 400ms and they were located symmetrically to each other from the fixation point. Results suggested that the filling-in in the blind spot did not distort perceived length, and that there was lateral asymmetry in comparing bars which lengths do not intercept the blind spot. In Experiment II, two vertical bars were presented simultaneously also for 100, 300 or 400ms and symmetrically from the fixation point at five eccentricities in the visual hemifields of right eye in monocular viewing conditions. Bars at the farther and closest eccentricity never intercepted the blind spot, and the bars at intermediate eccentricities could intercept the central and peripheral regions of the blind spot. Results also indicated that the filling-in in the blind spot did not distort perceived size, and that there was lateral asymmetry in comparing size as the standard bar was at the left visual hemifield. In Experiment III, the blind spot of the right eye was mapped and length bar comparisons were done in dichotic conditions in such way that only the left brain was involved. Two vertical bars were presented at five eccentricities like in Experiment II, but they were presented sequentially for 200 ms with an interval of 400 ms between presentations. Results also indicated that the filling-in did not affect perceived size. These three experiments suggest that there is a weak lateral asymmetry in size comparisons due to the inter-hemispheric brain effect and that the associative explanation proposed by Trypathy et al. (1995) is the best alternative to explain the filling-in in the blind spot. (AU) | |