The International Constitutional Court (ICoC) and its Institutional Design as an I...
American foreign policy in the post-Cold War: what do democrats and republicans th...
![]() | |
Author(s): |
Camila Lissa Asano
Total Authors: 1
|
Document type: | Master's Dissertation |
Press: | São Paulo. |
Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas (FFLCH/SBD) |
Defense date: | 2009-05-08 |
Examining board members: |
Maria Herminia Brandao Tavares de Almeida;
Michelle Ratton Sanchez;
Rafael Antonio Duarte Villa
|
Advisor: | Maria Herminia Brandao Tavares de Almeida |
Abstract | |
This research aimed to analyze the performance of the States in international institutions based on a case study on the United Nations (UN) Commission on Human Rights (CHR). The States´ votes were used as the main source of information to compare their behavior at the Commission, more precisely, to analyze the converging and diverging voting patterns among the Commission Member-States from 1995 to 2005. The research question that guided this study was if there the CHR would present voting patterns that allow the identification of States´ behavior in it. The results of the empirical study provide inputs for certain behaviors to be identified and for new research questions to be raised. (AU) |