Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Fernando José Malagueño de Santana
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | Ribeirão Preto. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto (PCARP/BC) |
| Defense date: | 2008-11-12 |
| Examining board members: |
Norberto Peporine Lopes;
Carmem Dickow Cardoso;
Isabel Cristina Sales Fontes Jardim;
Vera Lucia Lanchote;
Bruno Spinosa de Martinis
|
| Advisor: | Pierina Sueli Bonato |
| Abstract | |
The need for appropriate methodology for the analysis of drugs and their metabolites in complex biological matrices led to a growing interest in developing new techniques for sample preparation, particularly microextraction techniques because they are highly selective and require a minimum consumption of organic solvents. Allied to these developments, the employment of modern and efficient analytical technologies, such as capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS), has resulted in a considerable improvement in quality in the analytical methodologies available for bioanalysis. In this context, it is worth to mention the use of such techniques to develop enantioselective methodologies, allowing the quantification of the enantiomers of drugs administered as racemates. Therefore, we proposed the development and validation of enantioselective methodologies for the analysis of the enantiomers of mirtazapine (MRT) and of its main metabolites in plasma and urine, using the CE and LC-MS-MS. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) and liquid phase microextraction (LPME) were used for sample preparation. In the first method, LPME was used to extract the analytes from plasma samples (1 ml), previously diluted, alkalinized with 3.0 mL 0.5 mol L-1 pH 8 phosphate buffer solution and supplemented with 15% (w/v) sodium chloride. N-hexyl ether and 0.01 mol L-1 acetic acid solution were used as solvent extractor and acceptor phase, respectively. The analyses were carried out on a CHIRALPAK AD-RH column and acetonitrile: methanol: ethanol (98:1:1, v / v / v) plus 0.2% of diethylamine was used as mobile phase, at a flow rate of 1 mL min-1. The detection was performed by LC-MS-MS equipped with a triple-quadrupole analyzer and ionization by eletrospray positive. Under these conditions, recoveries were from 18.3 to 45.5%; linear response over the 1,25-125 ng ml-1 concentration range and limit of quantification (LOQ) of 1.25 ng ml-1 for all enantiomers evaluated were obtained. CE and LPME were also used for the analysis of MRT and its main metabolites in urine. Before the extraction, urine samples (1 mL) were submitted to enzymatic hydrolysis at 37 ºC for 16 hours, the enzyme was precipitated with trichloroacetic acid, the pH was adjusted to 8 with 0.5 mol L-1 phosphate buffer solution (pH 11) and 10% (w/v) sodium chloride was further added. Then, the LPME extraction was performed according to the procedure previously developed. The electrophoretic analyses were carried out in 50 mmol L-1 phosphate buffer solution (pH 2.5) containing 0.55% (w/v) carboxymethyl-b-cyclodextrin (CM-b-CD). The method was linear over the concentration range of 62.5-2500 ng mL-1 for each MRT and 8-OHM enantiomer and 62.5-1250 ng mL-1 for each DMR enantiomer. The quantification limit (LOQ) was 62.5 ng mL-1 for all the enantiomers. A SPME method was also developed for the simultaneous enantioselective determination of MRT and its metabolites in urine using CE and LC-MS-MS. The target analytes were transferred from the hydrolyzed aqueous solution to the polydimetylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PMDS-DVB) fiber coating and then desorbed in methanol. The means recoveries were 12 % for the enantiomers of MRT, 3.8 % for DMR and 0.72 % for 8-OHM. The method was linear over the concentration range of 62.5-2500 ng mL-1 with suitable LOQ (62.5 ng mL-1) for all the enantiomers. The precision and accuracy were lower than 15% for all developed methods. Moreover, the methods were successfully employed for the determination of MRT, 8-OHM and DMR enantiomers in plasma and urine samples obtained after oral administration of a single dose of rac-MRT to healthy volunteers. (AU) | |