Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Danilo Horta
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Press: | São Carlos. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação (ICMC/SB) |
| Defense date: | 2013-11-25 |
| Examining board members: |
Ricardo José Gabrielli Barreto Campello;
Heloisa de Arruda Camargo;
Dilvan de Abreu Moreira;
Marcos Gonçalves Quiles;
Marcilio Carlos Pereira de Souto
|
| Advisor: | Ricardo José Gabrielli Barreto Campello |
| Abstract | |
There are data sets for which the instances are naturally represented by more than one view. For example, images can be described by attributes of color, texture, and shape. Proteins can be characterized by the amino acid sequence and by their three-dimensional description. The unification of different views of a data set can be problematic because they may not be comparable or may have different degrees of importance. These degrees of importance may even manifest itself locally, according to the data substructures. This prompted the emergence of clustering algorithms capable of handling multi-represented data sets (i.e., data sets having more than one view) as the SCAD algorithm. This algorithm has shown promising results in experiments reported in the literature, but it has critical problems identified in this work that hinder its application in certain scenarios. These problems were solved here by proposing a new version of the algorithm, called ASCAD, based on formal proofs about its correctness. We developed relational versions for ASCAD, capable of handling data sets described only by the proximities between the instances. We also developed an index for internal and relative validation of multi-represented data clusterings. The evaluation of possibilistic clustering and bi-clustering by comparing the found and reference solutions (external validation) was also explored. Bi-clustering algorithms have gained increasing interest from the community of gene expression analysis. However, little is known of the behavior and properties of the measures aimed at external validation of bi-clustering, which motivated a theoretical and empirical analysis of these measures in this work. This analysis showed that most bi-clustering measures has critical issues and highlighted two of the measures as being the most promising. We included in this analysis three measures of non-exclusive partitional clustering, whose use in comparing bi-clusterings is possible through a new approach proposed in this thesis. Non-exclusive partitional clustering belong to a more general domain of solutions, i.e., the domain of possibilistic clusterings. There are some important conceptual flaws in the measures of possibilistic clustering, which motivated us to develop new measures and to conceptually and empirically analyse 34 measures. One of the proposed measures stood out as being the one who presented unbiased evaluations regarding the number of clusters, the maximum similarity when comparing the optimal solution with the reference one, and evaluations sensitive to solution differences in all scenarios considered (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 09/17469-6 - New Approaches for Subspace and Semi-Supervised Clustering |
| Grantee: | Danilo Horta |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate |