Full text
| |
| Author(s): |
Caroline Evangelista Lopes
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Master's Dissertation |
| Press: | São Paulo. |
| Institution: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas (FFLCH/SBD) |
| Defense date: | 2013-10-09 |
| Examining board members: |
Christian Werner;
Teodoro Rennó Assunção;
Adriane da Silva Duarte
|
| Advisor: | Christian Werner |
| Abstract | |
The composition, transmission and preservation of the verses that compose the Homeric poems are matters that accompany philology since its inception. The oral theory and its hypothesis of composition in performance brought to Homeric studies new ways to approach these matters. In the last decades, researchers on oral theory have been analyzing to what extent this presentation or creation context of the Homeric poems influenced its construction and how it is possible to identify traces of enunciation in the current texts. It is the case of Egbert J. Bakker, who, based on the context of enunciation, that is, the performance itself, highlighted the deictic aspect of verbal augment in indicative aorist. Based on the vision of the Iliad and Odyssey as results of enunciation acts in specific contexts of oral presentation, this research examine the variation of augmented or not augmented forms of secondary indicative in some passages of books XI, XVI and XXI of the Iliad to check for a specific context in the narration that motivates the use of verbal augment. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 10/13622-1 - The Verbal Augment in Homeric Narrative. |
| Grantee: | Caroline Evangelista Lopes |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Master |