Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Early mobilization practice in a single Brazilian intensive care unit

Full text
Author(s):
Pires-Neto, Ruy Camargo [1] ; Lima, Natalia Pontes [2] ; Cardim, Gregorio Marques [2] ; Park, Marcelo [3] ; Denehy, Linda [4]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo FMUSP, Fac Med, Dept Patol, BR-01246903 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[2] Fac Med Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Inst Cent, Physiotherapy Serv, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[3] Fac Med Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Inst Cent, Intens Care Unit, Clin Emergency Dept, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Parkville, Vic 3052 - Australia
Total Affiliations: 4
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE; v. 30, n. 5, p. 896-900, OCT 2015.
Web of Science Citations: 5
Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the provision of early mobilization therapy in critically ill patients in a Brazilian medical intensive care unit (ICU) and to investigate the relationship between physical activity level and clinical outcomes. Methods: Intensive care unit and physiotherapy data were collected retrospectively from 275 consecutive patients. Here we report on the subset of patients (n = 120) who were mechanically ventilated during their ICU stay (age, 49 +/- 18 years; Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, 45 {[}25]). Results: Median (interquartile range) time of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay were 3 (4) and 8 (10) days, respectively. Intensive care unit and 1-year mortality were 31% and 50%, respectively. During the ICU stay, these patients all received respiratory physiotherapy and 90% (n = 108) received mobilization therapy. When intubated and ventilated, mobilization therapy was performed in 76% (n = 92) of the patients with no adverse events. The most common activity was in-bed exercises (55%), and the number of out-of-bed activities (sitting out of bed, standing, or walking) was small (29%) and more prevalent in patients with tracheostomy than with an endotracheal tube (27% x 2%, respectively). Conclusion: In our Brazilian ICU, mobilization therapy in critically ill patients was safe and feasible; however, similar to other countries, in-bed exercises were the most prevalent activity. During mechanical ventilation, only a small percentage of activities involved standing or mobilizing away from the bed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 14/12266-8 - European Respiratory Society Annual Congress 2014
Grantee:Ruy de Camargo Pires Neto
Support type: Research Grants - Meeting - Abroad