Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Influence of Curing Units and Indirect Restorative Materials on the Hardness of Two Dual-curing Resin Cements Evaluated by the Nanoindentation Test

Full text
Author(s):
Kuguimiya, Rosiane Noqueira [1] ; Rode, Katia Martins [1] ; Acatauassu Carneiro, Paula Mendes [1] ; Correa Aranha, Ana Cecilia [1] ; Turbino, Miriam Lacalle [1]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 1
Document type: Journal article
Source: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry; v. 17, n. 3, p. 243-248, 2015.
Web of Science Citations: 3
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the hardness of a dual-curing self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200) and a conventional dual-curing resin cement (RelyX ARC) cured with different light curing units of different wavelengths (Elipar Freelight 2 LED {[}430 to 480 nm, conventional], Bluephase LED {[}380 to 515 nm, polywave], AccuCure 3000 Laser {[}488 nm]) by means of the nanoindentation test. Materials and Methods: Bovine incisors were cleaned and then sectioned at the cementoenamel junction to remove the crown. After embedding in acrylic, dentin surfaces of the specimens were exposed and ground flat to standardize the surfaces. To simulate clinically placing indirect restorations, ceramic (IPS e.maxPress/Ivoclar Vivadent) or indirect composite resin (SR Adoro/Ivoclar Vivadent) slabs were cemented on dentin surfaces. The specimens were sectioned longitudinally at low speed under constant irrigation and then polished. In the positive control group, the cement was light cured without the interposition of indirect restorative material; in the negative control group, after the indirect restorative material was cemented, no light curing was performed, allowing only chemical polymerization of the cement. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. Nanoindentadion hardness of the cement layer was measured under a 100-mN load. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: Although the self-adhesive cement is technically simple, conventional cement showed the best polymerization performance. The polywave LED technology did not differ significantly from other light-curing units. The hardness of the resin cements evaluated was negatively influenced by the interposition of an indirect restorative material; only the LEDs were able to maintain the same degree of cement polymerization when an indirect restorative material was used. Conclusion: The photoactivation step is required during the cementation of indirect restorations to ensure adequate polymerization of dual-curing resin cements. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 12/09949-0 - Influence of light-curing units and indirect restorative material on the hardness and elastic modulus of two dual-cured resin cements
Grantee:Míriam Lacalle Turbino
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants