Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Trophic categories in a mammal assemblage: diversity in an agricultural landscape

Full text
Author(s):
Graziela Dotta [1] ; Luciano M. Verdade [2]
Total Authors: 2
Affiliation:
[1] Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agronomia ‘Luiz de Queiroz’. Laboratório de Ecologia Animal - Brasil
[2] Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agronomia ‘Luiz de Queiroz’. Laboratório de Ecologia Animal - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: Biota Neotropica; v. 7, n. 2, p. 0-0, 2007-00-00.
Abstract

Mammals play an important role in the maintenance and regeneration of tropical forests since they have essential ecological functions and can be considered key-species in structuring biological communities. In landscapes with elevated anthropogenic pressure and high degree of fragmentation, species display distinct behavioral responses, generally related to dietary habits. The landscape of Passa-Cinco river basin, in the central-eastern region of São Paulo State, shows a high degree of anthropogenic disturbance, with sugar cane plantations, eucalyptus forests, native semideciduous forest remnants and pastures as the key habitat types in the region. We surveyed medium to large mammals in those habitats and determined species richness and relative abundance for each of the following trophic categories: Insectivore/Omnivores, Frugivore/Omnivores, Carnivores, Frugivore/Herbivores and Herbivore/Grazers. Differences in species richness and relative abundance among habitats were tested using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test, considering 1) each of the trophic categories individually and 2) the set of categories together. Between July 2003 and June 2004, 284.4 km were walked and 22 species were recorded (20 native and two exotics). Analysis of variance did not detect differences in species richness for any of the trophic categories or for the assemblage. Considering relative abundance, the analysis detected significant differences only for the whole assemblage, with the assemblage being more abundant in sugar cane plantations compared to pastures. Our results indicate that the heterogeneous landscape of the study area is dominated by generalist species adapted to use different habitat types and food items. (AU)