Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Reliability and Validity of the Belt-Stabilized Handheld Dynamometer in Hip- and Knee-Strength Tests

Full text
Author(s):
Martins, Jaqueline [1] ; da Silva, Janaina Rodrigues [1] ; Barbosa da Silva, Marcelo Rodrigues [1] ; Bevilaqua-Grossi, Debora [1]
Total Authors: 4
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Ave Bandeirantes, 3900 Monte Alegre, BR-14049900 Ribeirao Preto, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 1
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING; v. 52, n. 9, p. 809-819, SEP 2017.
Web of Science Citations: 4
Abstract

Context: The belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer (HHD) has been used to assess the strength of knee-and hip-muscle groups. However, few researchers have examined its reliability and validity for assessing the strength of these muscles. Objective: To evaluate the intra-examiner reliability of the belt-stabilized HHD and its validity and agreement with the isokinetic dynamometer for assessing the strength of knee-and hip-muscle groups. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: University laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: We evaluated 26 healthy participants (13 men, 13 women; age = 23.5 +/- 2.8 years, height = 1.7 +/- 0.1 m, mass = 68.6 +/- 12.4 kg) in 2 sessions using the belt-stabilized HHD and an isokinetic dynamometer for maximum strength of the hip adductors, abductors, flexors, extensors, internal rotators, and external rotators and the knee flexors and extensors. Main Outcome Measure(s): We used reliability values provided by the intraclass correlation coefficient (2,3), standard error of measurement (SEM and percentage SEM), and minimal detectable change; correlation values comparing the belt-stabilized HHD and the isokinetic instrument using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r); and the mean difference in values comparing the 2 instruments using the Bland-Altman method. Results: The intrarater HHD reliability was excellent for most measurements (range = 0.80-0.96; SEM = 1.3-5.3 kilograms of force or 4.8-18.9 Nm, percentage SEM = 7.0%22.0%, minimal detectable change = 3.6-18.8 kilograms of force or 13.2-52.4 Nm) and was moderate only for bilateral knee flexion and left hip internal rotation (intraclass correlation coefficient {[} 2,3] = 0.62-0.66 and 0.70, respectively). Correlation with the isokinetic dynamometer was moderate to high (r = 0.60-0.90), but the absolute values did not demonstrate concordance between results using the Bland-Altman method. Conclusions: The belt-stabilized HHD measurements were reliable, and although they did not agree with those from the isokinetic dynamometer, the values were correlated for the hipand knee-muscle groups. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/25755-4 - Reliability and validity of the Lafayette® hand-held dynamometer for clinical use in Physiotherapy
Grantee:Janaina Rodrigues Alves
Support type: Scholarships in Brazil - Master