| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Caleffi-Pereira, Mayra
[1]
;
Pletsch-Assuncao, Renata
[1]
;
Cardenas, Leticia Zumpano
[1]
;
Santana, Pauliane Vieira
[1]
;
Ferreira, Jeferson George
[1]
;
Iamonti, Vinicius Carlos
[1]
;
Caruso, Pedro
[1]
;
Fernandez, Angelo
[2]
;
Ribeiro de Carvalho, Carlos Roberto
[1]
;
Pereira Albuquerque, Andre Luis
[3, 1]
Total Authors: 10
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Hosp Clin, Pulm Div, Heart Inst Incor, Ave Dr Eneas Carvalho Aguiar 44, BR-05403900 Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Thorac Surg Div, Heart Inst Incor, Hosp Clin, Fac Med, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Sirio Libanes Teaching & Res Inst, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE; v. 18, AUG 2 2018. |
| Web of Science Citations: | 2 |
| Abstract | |
Background: Most patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (UDP) have unexplained dyspnea, exercise limitations, and reduction in inspiratory muscle capacity. We aimed to evaluate the generation of pressure in each hemidiaphragm separately and its contribution to overall inspiratory strength. Methods: Twenty-seven patients, 9 in right paralysis group (RP) and 18 in left paralysis group (LP), with forced vital capacity (FVC) < 80% pred, and 20 healthy controls (CG), with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) > 80% pred and FVC > 80% pred, were evaluated for lung function, maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressure measurements, diaphragm ultrasound, and transdiaphragmatic pressure during magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (Pdi(Tw)). Results: RP and LP had significant inspiratory muscle weakness compared to controls, detected by MIP (-57.4 +/- 16.9 for RP; -67.1 +/- 28.5 for LP and -103.1 +/- 30.4 cmH(2)O for CG) and also by Pdi(TW) (5.7 +/- 4 for RP; 4.8 +/- 2.3 for LP and 15.3 +/- 5.7 cmH(2)O for CG). The PdiTw was reduced even when the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm was stimulated, mainly due to the low contribution of gastric pressure (around 30%), regardless of whether the paralysis was in the right or left hemidiaphragm. On the other hand, in CG, esophagic and gastric pressures had similar contribution to the overall Pdi (around 50%). Comparing both paralyzed and non-paralyzed hemidiaphragms, the mobility during quiet and deep breathing, and thickness at functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC), were significantly reduced in paralyzed hemidiaphragm. In addition, thickness fraction was extremely diminished when contrasted with the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm. Conclusions: In symptomatic patients with UDP, global inspiratory strength is reduced not only due to weakness in the paralyzed hemidiaphragm but also to impairment in the pressure generated by the non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm. (AU) | |