Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

ACUTE EFFECTS OF ACTIVE, BALLISTIC, PASSIVE, AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION STRETCHING ON SPRINT AND VERTICAL JUMP PERFORMANCE IN TRAINED YOUNG SOCCER PLAYERS

Full text
Author(s):
Oliveira, Lucas P. [1] ; Vieira, Luiz H. P. [1] ; Aquino, Rodrigo [1, 2] ; Manechini, Joao P. V. [1] ; Santiago, Paulo R. P. [3] ; Puggina, Enrico F. [3, 1]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Postgrad Program Rehabil & Funct Performance, Ribeirao Preto, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Sport, CIFI2D, Porto - Portugal
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Phys Educ & Sport Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH; v. 32, n. 8, p. 2199-2208, AUG 2018.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of active (AC), ballistic (BA), passive (PA), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching methods on performance in vertical jumping, sit and reach, and sprinting in young soccer players. Twelve trained soccer players (1 7.67 +/- 0.87 years) participated in the study. The jump height (H), peak power (PP), and relative power (RP) in the squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ), the range of motion (ROM), the rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and time (seconds) in 10-20-30-m sprints were evaluated. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in H were found in the comparisons between the PA and control (CO) condition for the SJ. For the CMJ, differences in H were observed between the PA and CO, and PNF with CO and BA, and in the PP between the PNF and CO, AC, and BA, as well as in the RP between the PNF and BA. Significant increases in ROM were found in the AC, BA, PA, and PNF compared with the CO. In relation to RPE, higher scores were reported in the PA and PNF conditions compared with the AC and BA. No significant differences were found in 10-20-30-m sprints. Therefore, the AC and BA methods can be used before vertical jump and sprint activities, with the aim of increasing flexibility. However, the PA and PNF methods should be avoided because of subsequent negative effects on vertical jump performance. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 14/16164-5 - Effects of strength training with vascular occlusion on motor performance in young adults
Grantee:Enrico Fuini Puggina
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants