Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

In Vitro Antimicrobial Effect of Bioadhesive Oral Membrane with Chlorhexidine Gel

Full text
Author(s):
Annelyze Podolan Kloster [1] ; Natalino Lourenço Neto [2] ; Silgia Aparecida da Costa [3] ; Thais Marchini Oliveira [4] ; Rodrigo Cardoso de Oliveira [5] ; Maria Aparecida Andrade Moreira Machado [6]
Total Authors: 6
Affiliation:
[1] Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Community Dentistry - Brasil
[2] Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Community Dentistry - Brasil
[3] Universidade de São Paulo. School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities. Course on Textiles and Fashion - Brasil
[4] Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Community Dentistry - Brasil
[5] Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Biochemistry - Brasil
[6] Universidade de São Paulo. Bauru Dental School. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Community Dentistry - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 6
Document type: Journal article
Source: Brazilian Dental Journal; v. 29, n. 4, p. 354-358, 2018-08-00.
Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate in vitro the antimicrobial effect of a bioadhesive chitosan-based oral membrane with chlorhexidine for local treatment of infections in the oral tissues. Five oral membranes of different compositions were tested: 5% chitosan (G1); 5% chitosan ± 0.2% chlorhexidine (G2), 5% chitosan ± 0.6% chlorhexidine (G3), 5% chitosan ± 1.0% chlorhexidine (G4), and 5% chitosan ± 2.0% chlorhexidine (G5). Also, five gel types were tested according to the following compositions: 5% chitosan gel (G6), 0.2% chlorhexidine gel (G7), 2.0% chlorhexidine gel (G8), 5% chitosan gel ± 0.2% chlorhexidine gel (G9), and 5% chitosan gel ± 2.0% chlorhexidine gel (G10). The antimicrobial action of the samples was tested against Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans through antibiogram by measuring the inhibition halos. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). The 2.0% chlorhexidine membrane (G5) and the disks containing 2.0% chlorhexidine gel (G8) showed the greatest inhibition halos for both microorganisms, with statistically significant difference when compared to others tested groups (p=0.008) only for Candida albicans inhibitions results. All the other formulations of membranes and gels showed inhibition halos, but without statistically significant difference. The bioadhesive chitosan-based oral membrane with 2% chlorhexidine and 2% chlorhexidine gel were the most effective in inhibiting the tested microorganisms. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/07836-7 - Analysis and development of a dentin/pulpar biostimulating bandage (BBio)
Grantee:Natalino Lourenço Neto
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral