Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Phylogenomic incongruence, hypothesis testing, and taxonomic sampling: The monophyly of characiform fishes

Full text
Author(s):
Betancur-R, Ricardo [1, 2, 3] ; Arcila, Dahiana [1, 4, 2] ; Vari, Richard P. [4] ; Hughes, Lily C. [5, 1] ; Oliveira, Claudio [6] ; Sabaj, Mark H. [7] ; Orti, Guillermo [5, 1]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Smithsonian Inst, Natl Museum Nat Hist, Dept Vertebrate Zool, Washington, DC 20013 - USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Biol, Norman, OK 73019 - USA
[3] Univ Puerto Rico, Dept Biol, Rio Piedras Campus, San Juan, PR 00931 - USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum Nat Hist, Norman, OK 73019 - USA
[5] George Washington Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Washington, DC 20052 - USA
[6] Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Morfol, Botucatu, SP - Brazil
[7] Drexel Univ, Acad Nat Sci, Dept Ichthyol, Philadelphia, PA 19103 - USA
Total Affiliations: 7
Document type: Journal article
Source: Evolution; v. 73, n. 2, p. 329-345, FEB 2019.
Web of Science Citations: 11
Abstract

Phylogenomic studies using genome-wide datasets are quickly becoming the state of the art for systematics and comparative studies, but in many cases, they result in strongly supported incongruent results. The extent to which this conflict is real depends on different sources of error potentially affecting big datasets (assembly, stochastic, and systematic error). Here, we apply a recently developed methodology (GGI or gene genealogy interrogation) and data curation to new and published datasets with more than 1000 exons, 500 ultraconserved element (UCE) loci, and transcriptomic sequences that support incongruent hypotheses. The contentious non-monophyly of the order Characiformes proposed by two studies is shown to be a spurious outcome induced by sample contamination in the transcriptomic dataset and an ambiguous result due to poor taxonomic sampling in the UCE dataset. By exploring the effects of number of taxa and loci used for analysis, we show that the power of GGI to discriminate among competing hypotheses is diminished by limited taxonomic sampling, but not equally sensitive to gene sampling. Taken together, our results reinforce the notion that merely increasing the number of genetic loci for a few representative taxa is not a robust strategy to advance phylogenetic knowledge of recalcitrant groups. We leverage the expanded exon capture dataset generated here for Characiformes (206 species in 23 out of 24 families) to produce a comprehensive phylogeny and a revised classification of the order. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 14/26508-3 - Phylogeny of the hyperdiverse order Characiformes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) using ultraconserved elements
Grantee:Claudio de Oliveira
Support Opportunities: Research Projects - Thematic Grants