Cryopreservation and fertility of ejaculated and epididymal sperm from subfertile ...
Proteomic analysis of ejaculated and epididymal sperm plasma membrane in stallions
Full text | |
Author(s): |
G.A. Monteiro
[1]
;
C. Ramires Neto
[2]
;
Y.F.R. Sancler-Silva
[3]
;
L.Z. Oliveira
[4]
;
C.P.F.D. Aqua
[5]
;
F.P. Hartwig
[6]
;
P.M. Papa
[7]
;
J. Pantoja
[8]
;
D.F. Silva
[9]
;
F.O. Papa
[10]
Total Authors: 10
|
Affiliation: | [1] Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brasil
[2] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
[3] Universidade Federal de Viçosa - Brasil
[4] Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brasil
[5] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
[6] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
[7] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
[8] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
[9] Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Brasil
[10] Universidade Estadual Paulista - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 10
|
Document type: | Journal article |
Source: | Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia; v. 71, n. 3, p. 752-760, 2019-06-14. |
Abstract | |
ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the addition of seminal plasma from high and low fertility stallions on sperm viability of frozen-thawed sperm cells from ejaculate and from epididymal tail of subfertile stallions. Six stallions with a history of subfertility were used. After collection, ejaculate spermatozoa were divided into three aliquots: Botu-Semen® (EJ-CT); High-quality seminal plasma (EJ-PS1); Low-quality seminal plasma (EJ-PS2). The same was done with sperm cells from epididymis tail after orchiectomy (EP-CT; EP-PS1; EP-PS2). Evaluations of sperm kinetics were assessed by CASA and membrane and acrosome integrity, DNA fragmentation, sperm capacitation and sperm peroxidation were assessed by flow cytometry. After thawing, no differences were observed between ejaculated sperm (EJ) and epididymal sperm (EP) in any CASA evaluations. However, higher (P< 0.05) percentage of cells with intact plasma and acrossomal membranes was observed in EP groups (EP-CT:31.7±7.5b; EP-PS1:35.2±7.0b; EP-PS2:33.9±7.2b) compared to EJ groups (EJ-CT:15.1±4.9a, EJ-PS1:11.7±4.5a, EJ-PS2:13.1±5,2a). In addition, differences in DNA fragmentation index were observed (EJ-CT:2.6±0.6a; EJ-PS1:2.4±0.8a; EJ-PS2:3.0±0.8a; CT:1.4±0.4b; EP-PS1:1.2±0.3b; EP-PS2:1.3±0.2b). It was concluded that the addition of 20% seminal plasma from fertile or subfertile animals prior to the freezing of epididymal spermatozoa from subfertile animals does not interfere in sperm quality. (AU) |