Can Compositionality Solve the Thought-or-Language Problem?

Author(s)

Krempel, Raquel

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: PHILOSOPHICAL PAPERS; v. 48, n. 2, p. 265-291, MAY 4 2019.
• Web of Science Citations: 0

Abstract

Jerry Fodor has claimed to have a solution to the traditional problem of what comes first, thought or language. Compositionality, he says, will give us the answer, for at least one must be compositional, and if only one of them is, that is the one that has underived semantic content. He argues that natural languages are not compositional, and therefore that the content of language is derived from the content of thought. I will argue that the idea that language is not compositional conflicts with his productivity and systematicity arguments for the existence of a language of thought. I will also show that Fodor's solution to the problem fails, as his main argument is circular. Finally, I suggest that Fodor's argument against the compositionality of language is not decisive, and that we can still attribute at least some degree of compositionality to language. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 14/15037-0 - The relation between thought and language starting from Jerry Fodor
• Grantee: Raquel Albieri Krempel
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate