Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Coevolution by different functional mechanisms modulates the structure and dynamics of antagonistic and mutualistic networks

Full text
Author(s):
de Andreazzi, Cecilia Siliansky [1, 2] ; Astegiano, Julia [1, 3] ; Guimaraes, Jr., Paulo R. [1]
Total Authors: 3
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Ecol, Rua Matao 321, Trav 14 Cid Univ, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Fiocruz MS, Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Lab Biol & Parasitol Mamiferos Silvestres Reserva, Rio De Janeiro - Brazil
[3] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Fac Ciencias Exactas Fis & Nat, Grp Interacc Ecol & Conservac, Inst Multidisciplin, Cordoba - Argentina
Total Affiliations: 3
Document type: Journal article
Source: OIKOS; v. 129, n. 2 NOV 2019.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

A central problem in the study of species interactions is to understand the underlying ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that shape and are shaped by trait evolution in interacting assemblages. The patterns of interaction among species (i.e. network structure) provide the pathways for evolution and coevolution, which are modulated by how traits affect individual fitness (i.e. functional mechanisms). Functional mechanisms, in turn, also affect the likelihood of an ecological interaction, shaping the structure of interaction networks. Here, we build adaptive network models to explore the potential role of coevolution by two functional mechanisms, trait matching and exploitation barrier, in driving trait evolution and the structure of interaction networks. We use these models to explore how different scenarios of coevolution and functional mechanisms reproduce the empirical network patterns observed in antagonistic and mutualistic interactions and affect trait evolution. Scenarios assuming coevolutionary feedback with a strong effect of functional mechanism better reproduce the empirical structure of networks. Antagonistic and mutualistic networks, however, are better explained by different functional mechanisms and the structure of antagonisms is better reproduced than that of mutualisms. Scenarios assuming coevolution by strong trait matching between interacting partners better explain the structure of antagonistic networks, whereas those assuming strong barrier effects better reproduce the structure of mutualistic networks. The dynamics resulting from the feedback between strong functional mechanisms and coevolution favor the stability of antagonisms and mutualisms. Selection favoring trait matching reduces temporal trait fluctuation and the magnitude of arms races in antagonisms, whereas selection due to exploitation barriers reduces temporal trait fluctuations in mutualisms. Our results indicate that coevolutionary models better reproduce the network structure of antagonisms than those of mutualisms and that different functional mechanisms may favor the persistence of antagonistic and mutualistic interacting assemblages. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 11/09951-2 - Plant-pollinator networks robustness to habitat loss: the influence of plant reproductive systems
Grantee:Julia Astegiano
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral
FAPESP's process: 09/54422-8 - Structure and coevolutionary dynamics in mutualistic networks
Grantee:Paulo Roberto Guimarães Junior
Support Opportunities: Research Grants - Young Investigators Grants