Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Three-dimensional tomographic assessment of the upper airway using 2 different imaging software programs: A comparison study

Full text
Author(s):
Garcia-Uso, Michele [1] ; Lima, Thiago F. [1] ; Trindade, Inge Elly K. [2, 3] ; Pimenta, Luiz Andre F. [4, 5] ; Trindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle [2, 3]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Bauru, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Physiol Lab, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Bauru, SP - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Biol Sci, Rua Silvio Marchione 2-20, BR-17043900 Bauru, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Dent, Craniofacial Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC - USA
[5] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Ecol, Chapel Hill, NC - USA
Total Affiliations: 5
Document type: Journal article
Source: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS; v. 159, n. 2, p. 217-223, FEB 2021.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Introduction: Several imaging software programs with different tools are available for upper airway (UAW) analysis by means of cone beam computed tomography. Because of this wide variability, this study aimed to compare the reproducibility of two of the most used software programs on UAW segmentation, that is, Dolphin Imaging (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif) and Mimics Research (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Methods: The sample consisted of 50 scans of adult subjects with Class III malocclusion; pharyngeal volume and minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA) were assessed twice by 2 experienced evaluators using both software programs. Intraand intersoftware and/or evaluator agreement were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman analysis was used to visualize the intersoftware and interevaluator agreement. Results: Using Mimics Research and Dolphin Imaging, the respective mean values of volume (cm(3)) were 27.1 +/- 8.4 and 24.7 +/- 8.1 (P < 0.05) and of mCSA (mm(2)) were 167.8 +/- 95.5 and 176.5 +/- 102.3 (P < 0.05). Although differences between software packages were observed on both the analyzed variables, the results showed a high intersoftware agreement, with ICC of 0.87 (volume) and 0.97 (mCSA) and mean bias of 24.6 (volume) and-8.8 (mCSA). A high intrasoftware agreement was also observed, with values varying from 0.83 to 0.99. Excellent intraand interevaluator agreement was also obtained, with ICC values from 0.93 to 0.99. Conclusions: Dolphin Imaging and Mimics Research individually provide highly reproducible results, with clinically acceptable agreement between them for UAW segmentation, providing consistent values for volume and mCSA. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/24524-9 - THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF UPPER AIRWAYS IN PATIENTS WITH CLEFT LIP AND PALATE AND MAXILLOMANDIBULAR DISCREPANCY
Grantee:Thiago Freire Lima
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master
FAPESP's process: 14/12574-4 - Three-dimensional assessment of upper airways in patients with cleft lip and palate and maxillomandibular discrepancy
Grantee:Thiago Freire Lima
Support Opportunities: Scholarships abroad - Research Internship - Master's degree