| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Regolin, Andre Luis
[1, 2, 3]
;
Oliveira-Santos, Luiz Gustavo
[4]
;
Ribeiro, Milton Cezar
[1]
;
Bailey, Larissa Lynn
[2]
Total Authors: 4
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Inst Biosci, Dept Biodivers, Spatial Ecol & Conservat Lab LEEC, Campus Rio Claro, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Colorado State Univ CSU, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO - USA
[3] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, Earth Observat & Geoinformat Div DIOTG, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul UFMS, Dept Ecol, Lab Movement & Populat Ecol, Campo Grande, MS - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 4
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; v. 36, n. 9, p. 2519-2533, SEP 2021. |
| Web of Science Citations: | 1 |
| Abstract | |
Context An understanding of species-habitat relationships is required to assess the impacts of habitat fragmentation and degradation. To date, habitat modeling in fragmented landscapes has relied on landscape composition and configuration metrics and the importance of habitat quality in determining species distributions has not been sufficiently explored. Objectives We evaluated how habitat use by herbivores and frugivorous mammals is shaped by a potential interaction of habitat amount and quality in the Brazilian Pantanal wetland. We also assessed if the contribution of habitat quality to species ` habitat use varies according to the species sensitivity to habitat loss. Methods We combined mammal detection data obtained from camera traps with thematic maps to estimate the amount of habitat and measured habitat quality using local environment variables and distance to waterbodies. Specifically, we used a single-season occupancy approach to evaluate the relative support of univariate, additive, and interactive relationships between species-specific habitat use and measures of habitat quality and quantity. Results Habitat quality was more important than habitat amount in determining species habitat use (occupancy) in a naturally fragmented landscape. Habitat quality alone was the best predictor of habitat use for two of the six species (white lipped peccary and collared peccary), but no species' habitat use was explained solely by habitat amount. Habitat amount was influential only when considered in conjunction with habitat quality covariates and only for two sensitive species to habitat loss (agouti and red brocket deer). Habitat quality alone was the best predictor of habitat use for two of the less sensitive species (white lipped peccary and collared peccary). Habitat use for two species was not explained by any covariate (tapir and gray brocket deer). Conclusions Conservation programs should incorporate both habitat quality and amount when dealing with sensitive species and prioritize habitat quality management when focusing in less sensitive species. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 13/50421-2 - New sampling methods and statistical tools for biodiversity research: integrating animal movement ecology with population and community ecology |
| Grantee: | Milton Cezar Ribeiro |
| Support Opportunities: | Regular Research Grants |