Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

The Effect of pH on Atenolol/Nanofiltration Membranes Affinity

Full text
Author(s):
Soares, Elisa Veridiani [1] ; Giacobbo, Alexandre [1, 2] ; Siqueira Rodrigues, Marco Antonio [3] ; de Pinho, Maria Norberta [4, 2] ; Bernardes, Andrea Moura [1]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Fed Univ Rio Grande Do Sul UFRGS, Postgrad Program Min Met & Mat Engn PPGE3M, Av Bento Goncalves 9500, BR-91509900 Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
[2] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Phys & Engn Adv Mat CeFEMA, Inst Super Tecn, Av Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon - Portugal
[3] Feevale Univ, Pure Sci & Technol Inst, Postgrad Program Mat Technol & Ind Proc, Rodovia RS 239 2755, BR-93525075 Novo Hamburgo, RS - Brazil
[4] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Chem Engn Dept, Av Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon - Portugal
Total Affiliations: 4
Document type: Journal article
Source: MEMBRANES; v. 11, n. 9 SEP 2021.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Nanofiltration has been shown to be effective in removing pharmaceutical compounds from water and wastewater, so different mechanisms can influence treatment performance. In the present work, we carried out a case study evaluating the performance of two nanofiltration membranes in the removal of Atenolol (ATN)-a pharmaceutical compound widely used for the treatment of arterial hypertension-under different conditions such as operating pressure, ATN concentration, and solution pH. By determining the B parameter, which quantifies the solute/membrane affinity, we verified that the solution pH influenced the performance of the membranes, promoting attraction or repulsion between the ATN and the membranes. At pH 2.5, both membranes and ATN were positively charged, causing electrostatic repulsion, showing lower values of the B parameter and, consequently, higher ATN rejections. At such a pH, the mean ATN rejection for the loose membrane (NF270) was 82%, while for the tight membrane (NF90) it was 88%. On the other hand, at 12 bar pressure, the NF70 membrane (5.1 x 10 (-5) m s(-1)) presented mean permeate fluxes about 2.8 times greater than the NF90 membrane (1.8 x 10(-5) m s(-1)), indicating that NF270 is the most suitable membrane for this application. (AU)