Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Can machines think? The controversy that led to the Turing test

Full text
Author(s):
Goncalves, Bernardo [1, 2]
Total Authors: 1
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Polytech Sch, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Philosophy Languages & Human Sci, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: AI & SOCIETY; JAN 2022.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

Turing's much debated test has turned 70 and is still fairly controversial. His 1950 paper is seen as a complex and multilayered text, and key questions about it remain largely unanswered. Why did Turing select learning from experience as the best approach to achieve machine intelligence? Why did he spend several years working with chess playing as a task to illustrate and test for machine intelligence only to trade it out for conversational question-answering in 1950? Why did Turing refer to gender imitation in a test for machine intelligence? In this article, I shall address these questions by unveiling social, historical and epistemological roots of the so-called Turing test. I will draw attention to a historical fact that has been only scarcely observed in the secondary literature thus far, namely that Turing's 1950 test emerged out of a controversy over the cognitive capabilities of digital computers, most notably out of debates with physicist and computer pioneer Douglas Hartree, chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, and neurosurgeon Geoffrey Jefferson. Seen in its historical context, Turing's 1950 paper can be understood as essentially a reply to a series of challenges posed to him by these thinkers arguing against his view that machines can think. Turing did propose gender learning and imitation as one of his various imitation tests for machine intelligence, and I argue here that this was done in response to Jefferson's suggestion that gendered behavior is causally related to the physiology of sex hormones. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 19/21489-4 - The future of artificial intelligence: the logical structure of Alan Turing's argument
Grantee:Bernardo Nunes Gonçalves
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral