Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

emodynamic response to exercise is impaired in individuals with Parkinson's diseas

Full text
Author(s):
Fernandes, Bianca [1] ; Barbieri, Fabio A. [2] ; Marcal, Isabela R. [1] ; Do Amaral, Vanessa T. [1] ; Simieli, Lucas [2] ; Penedo, Tiago [2] ; Ciolac, Emmanuel G. [1]
Total Authors: 7
Affiliation:
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Sci, Dept Phys Educ, Exercise & Chron Dis Res Lab ECDR, Av Engenheiro Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube 14-06, BR-17033360 Bauru, SP - Brazil
[2] Human Movement Res Lab MOVI LAB, Bauru, SP - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS; v. 62, n. 3, p. 389-394, MAR 2022.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

ABS T R A C T BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess hemodynamic and cardiac autonomic response to high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Twelve individuals (six men) with PD were randomly assigned to perform HIIE (4 min of warm-up followed by 21 min alternating 1 min at levels 15-17 with 2 min at levels 9-11 of rating of perceived exertion {[}RPE] in a cycle ergometer), MICE (4 min of warm-up followed by 26 min at levels 11-14 of RPE in a cycle ergometer) and control (CON; 30 min of sitting rest) interventions in separate days. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), endothelial reactivity and heart rate variability (HRV) were assessed before, immediately after and 45 min after each inter-vention. HR and exercise workload were measured during each intervention. RESULTS: Despite the within (high-vs. low-intensity intervals of HIIE) and between (HIIE vs. MICE) differences in workload during exercise sessions, HR was not different between high-(average HR=98 +/- 18 bpm) and low-intensity (average HR 97 +/- 19 bpm) intervals of HIIE, as well as between HIIE (average HR=97 +/- 18 bpm) and MICE (average HR=93 +/- 19 bpm) throughout the exercise. There were significant, but small, increases (P<0.01) in HR and systolic BP at post HIIE and MICE, which returned to levels similar to preintervention during recovery. There were no within-and between-intervention differences in diastolic BP, endothelial reactivity and HRV. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that hemodynamic response to exercise is impaired in individuals with PD. (Cite this article as: Fernandes B, Barbieri FA, Margal IR, do Amaral VT, Simieli L, Penedo T, et al. Hemodynamic response to exercise is impaired in individuals with Parkinson's disease. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2022;62:389-94. DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12111-5) (AU)

FAPESP's process: 18/09695-5 - Hemodynamic response to heated water-based exercise in older individuals with hypertension: effect of high-intensity interval versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise
Grantee:Isabela Roque Marcal
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Master