| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Cinira Magali Fortuna
[1]
;
Adriana Barbieri Feliciano
[2]
;
Monica Vilchez Silva
[3]
;
Maristel Kasper
;
Angelina Lettiere-Viana
[5]
;
Karen da Silva Santos
Total Authors: 6
|
| Affiliation: | [1] Universidade de São Paulo - Brasil
[2] Universidade Federal de São Carlos - Brasil
[3] Departamento Regional de Saúde de Araraquara - Brasil
[5] Universidade de São Paulo - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 6
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | Paidéia; v. 32, 2022-03-28. |
| Abstract | |
Abstract The National Policies of Humanization and Permanent Health Education (PHE) have shown advances and setbacks in their historical process. Some concepts from the theoretical framework of institutional analysis can contribute in these themes, such as the concept of analyzer. This article discusses the analyzers identified in an intervention research with professionals who work as supporters of humanization and/or articulators of PHE in municipalities of the state of São Paulo. The theoretical-methodological framework is the institutional analysis, socio-clinical line, focusing on the work of the analyzers. The intervention groups were composed of 30 participants. We highlight three analyzers: (1) the COVID-19 historical analyzer; (2) the time analyzer; (3) the silence analyzer. These analyzers evidence tensions such as: the peripheral place of primary care, discomfort in the face of “not knowing” and/or lethargy in the face of imposed non-doing, and the paradox of creating and interrupting both care actions and support for the teams. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 19/03848-7 - Contributions of action-research to the development of professional practices in permanent health education and institutional aid: intervention research |
| Grantee: | Cinira Magali Fortuna |
| Support Opportunities: | Research Grants - Research in Public Policies |