| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Carvalho, Julia R. G.
;
Trindade, Pedro H. E.
;
Conde, Gabriel
;
Antonioli, Marina L.
;
Funnicelli, Michelli I. G.
;
Dias, Paula P.
;
Canola, Paulo A.
;
Chinelatto, Marcelo A.
;
Ferraz, Guilherme C.
Total Authors: 9
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | ANIMALS; v. 12, n. 18, p. 20-pg., 2022-09-01. |
| Abstract | |
Simple Summary Facial expression (FE) has been used for pain diagnosis in horses. The current study aimed to identify pain in horses undergoing under-skin polylactide-based polymer implantation. Five statistical methods for analyzing FE were used, including conventional and new approaches. First, we scored the seven FEs separately. Subsequently, the scores of the seven FEs were added (SUM). Subsequently, principal component analysis (PCoA) was performed using the scores of the seven FEs obtained using the first method. Afterwards, weights were created for each FE based on each variable's contribution variability obtained from the PCoA (SUM.W). Finally, we applied a general score to the animal's face (GFS). The horses were filmed before and 24 and 48 h after implantation. The tissue sensitivity to mechanical stimulation and skin temperature of the horses were assessed at the same time points. The results show no changes in the FEs analyzed separately or jointly. The horses with incision and suture but no polymer implant displayed a higher pain-related FE 48 h after implantation, while the horses implanted with polymers displayed more apparent alterations in the mechanical skin sensitivity and temperature. Our findings show that the five statistical methods used to analyze the faces of the horses were not able to detect low-grade inflammatory pain. Facial-expression-based analysis has been widely applied as a pain coding system in horses. Herein, we aimed to identify pain in horses undergoing subcutaneously polylactide-based polymer implantation. The sham group was submitted only to surgical incision. The horses were filmed before and 24 and 48 h after implantation. Five statistical methods for evaluating their facial expressions (FEs) were tested. Primarily, three levels of scores (0, 1, and 2) were applied to the seven FEs (ear movements, eyebrow tension, orbicularis tension, dilated nostrils, eye opening, muzzle tension, and masticatory muscles tension). Subsequently, the scores of the seven FEs were added (SUM). Afterwards, principal component analysis (PCoA) was performed using the scores of the seven FEs obtained using the first method. Subsequently, weights were created for each FE, based on each variable's contribution variability obtained from the PCoA (SUM.W). Lastly, we applied a general score (GFS) to the animal's face (0 = without pain; 1 = moderate pain; 2 = severe pain). The mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) and cutaneous temperature (CT) values were collected at the same moments. The results show no intra- or intergroup differences, when evaluating each FE separately or in the GFS. In the intragroup comparison and 48 h after implantation, the control group showed higher values for SUM, PCoA, and SUM.W, although the horses implanted with polymers displayed more obvious alterations in the CT and MNT. Our findings show that the five statistical strategies used to analyze the faces of the horses were not able to detect low-grade inflammatory pain. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 17/10959-4 - Applicability of biopolymers implanted in horses |
| Grantee: | Júlia Ribeiro Garcia de Carvalho |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Master |
| FAPESP's process: | 15/26738-1 - Behavior and muscle biomarkers in rats submitted to overtraining syndrome |
| Grantee: | Guilherme de Camargo Ferraz |
| Support Opportunities: | Regular Research Grants |