| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Manica, Daniela Tonelli
;
Asensi, Karina Dutra
;
Mazzarelli, Gaia
;
Tura, Bernardo
;
Barata, Germana
;
Goldenberg, Regina Coeli Santos
Total Authors: 6
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | FRONTIERS IN GENETICS; v. 13, p. 12-pg., 2022-12-01. |
| Abstract | |
Despite proven scientific quality of menstrual blood mesenchymal cells, research and science output using those cells is still incipient, which suggests there is a resistance to the study of this type of cell by scientists, and a lack of attention to its potential for cell therapy, regenerative medicine and bioengineering. This study analyzes the literature about the menstrual blood mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (mbMSC) on the PubMed database between 2008-2020 and the social attention it received on Twitter. A comparative analysis showed that mbMSC accounts for a very small portion of mesenchymal cell research (0.25%). Most first authors are women (53.2%), whereas most last authors are men (63.74%), reinforcing an already known, and still significant, gender gap between last and corresponding authors. Menstrual blood tends to be less used in experiments and its scientific value tends to be underestimated, which brings gender bias to a technical and molecular level. Although women are more positive in the mbMSC debate on Twitter, communication efforts toward visibility and public interest in menstrual cells has room to grow. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 18/21651-3 - Body, gender and technosciences: menstrual blood's "stem cells" |
| Grantee: | Daniela Tonelli Manica |
| Support Opportunities: | Regular Research Grants |