Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand


Clinicians' perception of oral potentially malignant disorders: a pitfall for image annotation in supervised learning

Full text
Author(s):
Show less -
Araujo, Anna Luiza Damaceno ; de Souza, Eduardo Santos Carlos ; Faustino, Isabel Schausltz Pereira ; Saldivia-Siracusa, Cristina ; Brito-Sarracino, Tamires ; Adudurate Lopes, Marcio ; Vargas, Pablo Agustin ; Pearson, Alexander T. ; Kowalski, Luiz Paulo ; de Carvalho, Andre Carlos Ponce de Leon Ferreira ; Santos-Silva, Alan Roger
Total Authors: 11
Document type: Journal article
Source: ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY; v. 136, n. 3, p. 7-pg., 2023-09-01.
Abstract

Objective. The present study aims to quantify clinicians' perceptions of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) when evaluating, classifying, and manually annotating clinical images, as well as to understand the source of inter-observer variability when assessing these lesions. The hypothesis was that different interpretations could affect the quality of the annotations used to train a Supervised Learning model.Study design. Forty-six clinical images from 37 patients were reviewed, classified, and manually annotated at the pixel level by 3 labelers. We compared the inter-examiner assessment based on clinical criteria through the K statistics (Fleiss's kappa). The segmentations were also compared using the mean pixel-wise intersection over union (IoU). Results. The inter-observer agreement for homogeneous/non-homogeneous criteria was substantial (K = 63, 95% CI: 0.47-0.80). For the subclassification of non-homogeneous lesions, the inter-observer agreement was moderate (K = 43, 95% CI: 0.34-0.53) (P < .001). The mean IoU of 0.53 (0.22) was considered low.Conclusion. The subjective clinical assessment (based on human visual observation, variable criteria that have suffered adjustments over the years, different educational backgrounds, and personal experience) may explain the source of inter-observer discordance for the classification and annotation of OPMD. Therefore, there is a strong probability of transferring the subjectivity of human analysis to artificial intelligence models. The use of large data sets and segmentation based on the union of all labelers' annotations holds the potential to overcome this limitation. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2023;136:315-321) (AU)

FAPESP's process: 22/07276-0 - Clinicopathological and digital predictors of recurrence and malignancy of oral leukoplakia and proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: a clinical trial associated with the use of artificial intelligence
Grantee:Caique Mariano Pedroso
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate
FAPESP's process: 21/14585-7 - Artificial intelligence applied to the clinical and histopathological diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer
Grantee:Anna Luiza Damaceno Araujo
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral
FAPESP's process: 09/53839-2 - Creation of a Digital Pathology Laboratory using a histological slidescanner
Grantee:Oslei Paes de Almeida
Support Opportunities: Multi-user Equipment Program