Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Comparative evaluation of three laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques in rabbit’s model

Full text
Author(s):
Monica Carolina Nery Wittmaack [1] ; Maria Eduarda Bastos Andrade Moutinho Conceição [2] ; María Camila Maldonado Vera [3] ; Rachel Inamassu Faccini [4] ; Guilherme Sembenelli [5] ; Gabriel Luiz Montanhim [6] ; Mareliza Possa de Menezes [7] ; Fabiana Del Lama Rocha [8] ; Luiz Paulo Nogueira Aires [9] ; Paola Castro Moraes [10]
Total Authors: 10
Affiliation:
[1] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[2] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[3] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[4] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[5] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[6] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[7] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[8] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[9] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
[10] Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary. Department of Veterinary Surgery - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 10
Document type: Journal article
Source: Acta Cirurgica Brasileira; v. 38, 2023-12-01.
Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this randomized study was to compare the complications and perioperative outcome of three different techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Changes in the liver function test after LC techniques were investigated. Also, we compared the degree of postoperative adhesions and histopathological changes of the liver bed. Methods: Thirty rabbits were divided into three groups: group A) Fundus-first technique by Hook dissecting instrument and Roeder Slipknot applied for cystic duct (CD) ligation; group B) conventional technique by Maryland dissecting forceps and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) for CD seal; group C) conventional technique by EBVS for gallbladder (GB) dissection and CD seal. Results: Group A presented a longer GB dissection time than groups B and C. GB perforation and bleeding from tissues adjacent to GB were similar among tested groups. Gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase levels increased (p ≤ 0.05) on day 3 postoperatively in group A. By the 15th postoperative day, the enzymes returned to the preoperative values. Transient elevation of hepatic transaminases occurred after LC in all groups. Group A had a higher adherence score than groups B and C and was associated with the least predictable technique. Conclusions: LC can be performed using different techniques, although the use of EBVS is highly recommended. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 17/23402-8 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using vessel sealant device and modification of technique using hand tied loop in rabbits: experimental study
Grantee:Monica Carolina Nery Wittmaack
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate