Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Folic acid supplementation during early hepatocarcinogenesis: cellular and molecular effects

Full text
Author(s):
Andrade Chagas, Carlos Eduardo [1] ; Bassoli, Bruna Kempfer [1] ; Soares de Souza, Camila Alexandre [1] ; Deminice, Rafael [2] ; Jordao Junior, Alceu Afonso [2] ; Rupp Paiva, Sergio Alberto [3] ; Zaidan Dagli, Maria Lucia [4] ; Ong, Thomas Prates [1] ; Moreno, Fernando Salvador [1]
Total Authors: 9
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Food & Expt Nutr, Lab Diet Nutr & Canc, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Dept Med, Lab Nutr & Metab, Div Nutrol, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Botucatu, SP - Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Vet Med & Zootechny, Dept Pathol, Expt Oncol Lab, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 4
Document type: Journal article
Source: International Journal of Cancer; v. 129, n. 9, p. 2073-2082, NOV 1 2011.
Web of Science Citations: 9
Abstract

Folic acid (FA) supplementation during carcinogenesis is controversial. Considering the impact of liver cancer as a public health problem and mandatory FA fortification in several countries, the role of FA supplementation in hepatocarcinogenesis should be elucidated. We evaluated FA supplementation during early hepatocarcinogenesis. Rats received daily 0.08 mg (FA8 group) or 0.16 mg (FA16 group) of FA/100 g body weight or water (CO group, controls). After a 2-week treatment, animals were subjected to the ``resistant hepatocyte{''} model of hepatocarcinogenesis (initiation with diethylnitrosamine, selection/promotion with 2-acetylaminofluorene and partial hepatectomy) and euthanized after 8 weeks of treatment. Compared to the CO group, the FA16 group presented: reduced (p < 0.05) number of persistent and increased (p < 0.05) number of remodeling glutathione S-transferase (GST-P) positive preneoplastic lesions (PNL); reduced (p < 0.05) cell proliferation in persistent GST-P positive PNL; decreased (p < 0.05) hepatic DNA damage; and a tendency (p < 0.10) for decreased c-myc expression in microdissected PNL. Regarding all these parameters, no differences (p > 0.05) were observed between CO and FA8 groups. FA-treated groups presented increased hepatic levels of S-adenosylmethionine but only FA16 group presented increased S-adenosylmethionine/S-adenosylhomocysteine ratio. No differences (p > 0.05) were observed between experimental groups regarding apoptosis in persistent and remodeling GST-P positive PNL, and global DNA methylation pattern in microdissected PNL. Altogether, the FA16 group, but not the FA8 group, presented chemopreventive activity. Reversion of PNL phenotype and inhibition of DNA damage and of c-myc expression represent relevant FA cellular and molecular effects. (AU)